New Balance 1210: Ultra awesome!

tumblr_inline_mkqsh1WlPf1qz4rgp

by Erik Stanley

The New Balance 1210 (aka Leadville) busted in this year as an ultra trail shoe ready to toe the dirt line next to the Brooks Cascadia. With a smooth transition, 8mm offset, and 10.4 oz on the Rogue scale  (size 9), I really like this shoe.

The 1210 was designed for ultra running, and named after the Leadville 100 mile trail race. It was created by NB after testing and measuring how runners’ feet respond to Leadville itself. New Balance increased the volume of the upper to allow for foot swelling over longer distances. It also offers a slightly denser foam on the inner heel to provide some stability for tired feet, while the tongue is fairly protective and keeps the laces from adding pressure to the top of your foot.

Over the past few weeks I have spent a lot of time in this shoe as I rebuild my mileage. I logged 75 miles last week, with most of my runs on the Barton Creek Greenbelt and Bull Creek here in Austin,TX.

One run that stands out is my new Wednesday adventure run from the 360 access, The Hump-day Hump Run. This is a run open to the world! We meet at Taco Deli (Spyglass) and run 75 minutes (give or take a few miles) at 7:15 am on the Greenbelt. There are no trail markers or restrictions to where we go: we run, we talk, we eat tacos.

tumblr_inline_mkqx201wZ81qz4rgpThis past Wednesday we headed through the “Sweet 16″ where the trail crosses the creek 16 times within a few miles. This was the morning after more than 2″ of rain, so we were having fun! The shoe has a ton of room, and some would say it feels too wide. Being the “Leadville” I would say there is adequate space for 100 miles of foot-swelling mountain running. The shoe did drain really well, even with the multiple creek crossings.

As a lighter “ultra shoe”, I still don’t consider this a minimal running shoe. 8 mm offset is less than the Cascadia for sure, but she still has some girth. The Vibram tread is pretty grippy, as I found on some of the steeper sections, and I didn’t have to be overly cautious. Even on the wet limestone it stuck better than other trail shoes! The tread on the heel is reversed to keep you from slipping while braking on the downhills.There is some rock protection, but I still feel sharper rocks poke through a bit. For the most part, this provides enough protection for me.

I did pick up quite a bit of mud, as the trail was a fresh, soggy mix of mud and clay. No shoe could have kept the mud from sticking! I had to stop and tie my shoe a few times; it’ll take some knot experimentation to find out what works best to keep these laces tied.

I’d been dealing with pain and mild swelling on the top of my right foot since Cactus Rose, and the tongue on the 1210 does a solid job keeping off the pressure on that area. It’s not a fluffy pillow, but more like a Tempur-pedic pad that evenly distributes any pressure.

tumblr_inline_ml5mlayau61qz4rgpWe hit Travis Country and ran the road for a mile or so, which was fine – I didn’t slip or have any problems on the asphalt. We ended up hitting a few creek crossings on the way back from Rattle Snake, and I had one more shoelace tie to take care of before finishing at Taco Deli.

All in all, the 1210 is a great shoe that everyone should consider as their next trail purchase!

(Next week. You be there. Hump Day Hump Run from Taco Deli. 75min at 7:15am. Come explore!)

———————–

tumblr_inline_mkqxwfClDN1qz4rgpErik Stanley coaches The Off Rogues, a Rogue Running trail training group that is currently preparing for the Rogue Trail Series 30K!

Best New Shoes of 2013

by Chris McClung

wave riderMizuno Wave Rider 16 – Best Update

Mizuno’s Wave Rider has been a favorite of runners since its first version. The shoe has a firm but smooth ride with a forgiving upper that keeps your foot in place while still fitting a wide variety of feet.  Version 15 of the shoe was its best iteration yet, until Mizuno topped itself with this latest iteration. Version 16 has the same midsole and outsole that everyone loves (from Version 15), but the shoe now has an all-new upper that weighs a full ounce lighter than the previous version. The shoe dipped under 10 ounces, which puts it on par with many lightweight shoes that have much less cushioning. By using new materials and making small changes such as reducing the size of the logo on the in-step, Mizuno dropped the weight of the shoe without compromising the cushioning or feel of the shoe under foot. And, if you can cut a full ounce from each step without changing anything else, why wouldn’t you?!?

 

launchBrooks Launch – Best Return from the Dead

The Launch has been the best-kept secret in specialty running since its introduction three years ago. It was so good, in fact, that Brooks made only color changes to the original design until they famously announced that it was being dropped from its line, with plans to end production in December of 2012. With the announcement, message boards and blogs exploded in uproar as many Launch lovers (read: fanatics) screamed for its return. Brooks finally heard their cries, announcing in December that the Launch would return with throwback colors this month.

The shoe is elegant in its simplicity. Its midsole is void of many of the “technologies” that mark the signature designs of other more-marketed shoes, but the simplicity is what makes it great. It is lightweight at only 9.1 ounces, but with a cushioned feel that can support any type of runner. And, the ride is so smooth that your heel to toe transition in this shoe makes your stride nearly effortless at any pace. Long live the Launch!

 

boostAdidas Energy Boost – Best New Innovation

 

The Boost just debuted in February and, with it, Adidas is getting more attention in the running shoe category than it has in a decade. The signature component of this shoe is a newly designed midsole material that, according to lab tests from independent sources, has the most energy return of any midsole material ever placed in a shoe. The material is also reported to be highly durable and resistant to the effects of temperature that can wreak havoc on traditional foams, making it a great pick to combat the Texas heat. Putting it on, the shoe has a plush step-in feel, and when running, it can only be described as abnormally bouncy. The bounce feels strange at first but, after the initial shock-value fades, makes you feel like you can run forever in it. The upper is snug, flexible and fits a wider variety of feet than most other Adidas models with a more-narrow fit. Also, look out for two additional versions of the shoe coming later this year, the AdiStar Boost and Adios Boost, debuting in August and October, respectively.

 

1400New Balance 1400 – Best New Twist

The New Balance 1400, like the Brooks Launch, is known for its elegant simplicity, with a pure-foam midsole and no added bells and whistles. The shoe debuted last year to rave reviews. At 7.1 ounces, it is considered a “marathon racing shoe,” but the level of cushioning in the shoe feels more like 9-10 ounces, thanks to its innovative RevLite foam from New Balance that weighs 33% less than traditional foams. The high cushioning-to-weight ratio makes it extremely versatile to be used as a training shoe by some or as a racing flat by others. In June, New Balance will release a version of this shoe with a new competition-style upper that is also used in their super-light track spikes. This twist will drop another ounce from the shoe with no change to how the shoe feels under foot, permanently re-defining what it means to have lightweight cushioning. This, my friends, is not your father’s New Balance.

sayonaraMizuno Wave Sayonara – Most Anticipated Debut

In July, Mizuno is dropping the popular Wave Precision from its line, the original lightweight trainer, and replacing it with the all-new Wave Sayonara. Though the decision seems like a big gamble, it is a calculated risk forced in part by the changes to the Wave Rider mentioned above. With the Wave Rider now at 9.9 ounces, the Wave Precision was too similar at 9.5 ounces, so Mizuno is giving it an overhaul with a new name in the Sayonara. At Rogue, we can’t wait. Though we have not been able to try it yet, the Sayonara is reported to be over an ounce lighter than the Precision, with a more responsive ride and faster feel, all while maintaining similar levels of cushioning. If the fit is as good as the current Precision, which has the best-fitting upper on the wall, then these changes could be a recipe for our new favorite shoe. Hello to the Sayonara, good-bye to your running group friends after you lace on these new shoes this summer!

 See the published version of this article on page 12 of Naturally Fit Magazine!

Make Soup.

misosoup1by John Schrup

If you train with Rogue, you’ll hear us talk a lot about volume, and a lot about efforts. High volume, low volume, recovery effort, easy effort, moderate effort, hard effort. But what does that really mean?

Think of volume as the glue that holds everything together.  For each of you, you’ll find that you need different amounts of adhesive.  But the more adhesive you can use, the larger the volume of overall intensity you can attach.  And that is any intensity of greater than an easy effort.  For the sake of discussion, let’s call it mgp and faster.

Think about this.  If you go back and look at training logs of the very top men and women in the marathon world, greater than 50% of their weekly effort is recovery effort.  Greater than 50%.  Recovery effort.  Think about that, and then think about what yours is.  Probably nothing close to that, right?  So let’s look at it another way.

I like to cook.  Lately I’ve had the chance to cook more.  So I research and read recipes and talk to people and find out how to make the things I want to make.  It isn’t just following recipes, which is key, but it is also knowing where the emphasis is on certain ingredients or components of the meal.  You have to know the basics in order to play around with certain things according to your own wants so the dishes turn out just like you want them to.

Wait.  Come back.  It gets better.

So lately, I’ve been on a soup kick.  And specifically, Japanese soups.  I don’t know why.  I’ve never been to Japan.  I just like them.  The soups I mean.  The people too, I suppose.   Wait.  What?  I’m talking about the food, so we’ll go with that.

So the little Japanese market I go to over on Burnet is really awesome.  They have great stuff, and though I don’t know what most of the stuff is because it is written in Japanese, I like the idea of buying food stuffs with little cartoony kittens or mushrooms or little smurfy looking things on the packages.  And they’re all very happy, which tells me that whatever is inside is going to make me happy too.

So I asked the woman there how I should make this soup.  She took me around and showed me all the ingredients I’d need, and then told me the old school way to cook things–you know, from scratch–and then the short cut way how to make it.  Of course, because I like to make things difficult, I opted for the scratch method.  I figured if one of my boys ended up in the hospital with food poisoning, I could switch to the short cut version of preparation.

Anyway, she told me that, ultimately, the dashi is the key.  Dashi is the soup base.  It is the Japanese version of the Louisiana roux.  If you don’t have the dashi right, nothing else really matters.  And if you’ve got the dashi down, then all the ingredients become even more valuable–the flavor of each is at once highlighted and combined with others to make the wonderfully flavored meal.  Daikon, maybe some noodles–rice or buckwheat, whatever–garlic, ginger, onion, carrot; all the goodies, maybe some wakame or something; some pork or chicken if you’re going that route.  Whatever you put in, the dashi has to be good.

How is this related to what we do?

The base volume–which is not just a dedicated block, but includes ALL the easy running and workouts and everything you need to do–has to be good.  That’s your dashi.  The vegetable, seasonings and meats are the different workouts, none more important than the others, but necessary nonetheless.

So if you’re thinking, I need to be running 8 minute miles because I want to race a marathon at 7 minutes a mile and somewhere I read or heard that easy pace is one minute slower than race pace, well, you’re in a forest/trees situation.  Easy is an effort, and doesn’t correspond to pace exactly.  There is a range, as individualized as the number of runners, and so to look at “easy” as a pace rather than your own effort on any given day is to lack faith in your body’s innate ability to improve.

This is why I suggest that you do your running based either on time–without thought to distance–or distance, completely untimed.  Trust yourself.  Trust your body.  Trust your natural athletic ability, whatever it may be.  There is really no reason, other than that we need external reassurances, that you should consider your watch when you’re running easy days.

So to make a good soup, first you need to have a good dashi.  If you don’t have that, then you don’t have a meal, you’re just left with individual ingredients.

Check it:  For those of you who fancy yourself a dedicated runner, a dedicated marathoner, who wants to find out what you’re made of, John coaches Team Rogue on T, Th mornings at 5:30.

BHAG!

by coach Chris McClung

What’s a BHAG? We’ll get to that. We’ll also get to the epic, life-changing experience of a particular half marathon in Vancouver that I’d like you to join me for.

But first, a story. It’s a story about my journey in following sport over the last 4 months.

I love sport, and I love the purity of it. To me, sport provides the perfect crucible to test, experience, and prove the power of the human condition, to see what can be done when extremely hard work meets sweat, talent, and pressure and pain. And, when I follow a sport, I follow it all. I read every article, blog, and results sheet. I follow every tweet and post from the top-tier athletes to those looking for a break-through. I have glorified these athletes and made them gods in my own mind, looking for lessons and inspiration from them to apply in my own journey.

On October 10th, this mental construct all came crashing down. That is the day that the US Anti-Doping Administration released its evidence against Lance Armstrong. That information was since validated in last week’s Oprah interview. By now, I am sure you are tired of hearing about Lance, but this isn’t about him. It is about the subsequent mental crisis that has caused me to question my belief in all of sport.

If this could happen in cycling, where less money is at stake and the doping penalties are steeper than in other major sports, then what is happening elsewhere? What other major athlete-idols of mine are doing it? What am I really watching when I tune in with anticipation and awe to see the outcomes of any track race, marathon, or MLB/NFL/NBA game? If cyclists can’t really climb that fast up mountains without pharmaceutical help, then can that 300lb lineman really run that fast for 40 meters? Can that many marathoners really break 2:05 for the marathon? Can that many sprinters break 9.9 seconds for 100m? Is any of it real?

With this newfound cynicism in professional sports, I became more aware of the sources of inspiration all around me. To be clear, these sources of inspiration have always been there there, but I had never placed them at the top of the pedestal like I now know they deserve.

There is the story of Carey Harris. She started training in my group 5K/10K group two years ago with a desire to become more active and more consistent with her running. At the time, she told me that she didn’t really think a marathon or even a half marathon was for her. Somewhere along the way, she got hooked and has been training with Rogue ever since. About a year ago, she set a goal to run a half marathon under 2 hours. At the time, we talked about what needed to be done to make that happen. She committed to all it. For the last 12+ months, she has been doing all of the work to get there with no fanfare and no glory, just doing the work. On January 13th at the 3M Half Marathon, she did it. And, she not only did it, but she smashed it, finishing in 1 hours and 53 minutes. Carey is an inspiration because somewhere along the way she realized that her previous, self-imposed limits weren’t real and then went about obliterating them with hard work and commitment.

12146_4050479665925_1864275204_nThere is the story of coach Jennifer Howard-Brown. She trained for six months for her “A race” – the California International Marathon in December. Her goal was to qualify for Boston in a time of 3 hours and 45 minutes. On race day, she was faced with weather conditions that would have forced me to skip it altogether – sideways-rain and 30 mph winds. Many decided to race anyway, but with much lower race and time expectations. Jenn didn’t back down. She went for it anyway, leaving EVERYTHING on the course but finishing an agonizing 37 seconds short of her goal. Jenn didn’t hit her goal, but she did discover new depths of her soul. A discovery that will soon prove 3:45 to be a “slow” time for her. Jenn is an inspiration because she didn’t let external forces or self-doubt put boundaries on what she could accomplish on that day, and because even now she is still relentlessly pursuing the goal that she so narrowly missed.

Daniel 2_IBM 10kThere is also the story of Daniel West, whose story is better documented in his own words here.  Just over 18 months ago, his doctor said he was overweight, pre-diabetic, and had hypertension, needing medication to prevent further deterioration of his health. Instead of medication, Daniel made a decision to change his life. He did a 180 and had the courage to start working with a trainer and ultimately joined a running group – the Rogue Lemons. Daniel has lost 50 pounds, completed his first 10K, and now can do something he never thought he could do: call himself a runner. Daniel is an inspiration because he had the courage to change the trajectory of his life by stepping outside his comfort zone. Changing your life is incredibly hard work, and he hasn’t let that be an excuse.

I could write about countless others that have given me inspiration in the past six months, renewed my faith in the purity of sport and given me new, unsung heroes. Not only did these athletes dream big and set Big, Hairy, and Audacious Goals (BHAGs), but they also had the courage, commitment, and determination to pursue them without worrying about the outcome. Every one of us has a story like this inside of us, if we can dare to dream.

I have a BHAG for 2013. I want to take a journey of inspiration with 150 of you.

I am looking for people of all levels who want to set big goals (like Carey, Jenn and David) and then challenge each other to achieve them, culminating in a fun, inspiring, life-changing adventure to the SeaWheeze Half Marathon in Vancouver on August 10, 2013. I want to see what happens when 150 people from Austin dream together, train together, travel together, and then descend like a life-force on a city to run together and have fun together. I want people in Vancouver to wonder what’s going on in Austin, TX and to be changed by the stories, inspiration, and community that we bring. And, I want us all to fly up together on a chartered Boeing 737, because why not?!?

If you are interested in joining me on this journey (whether you decide to train with Rogue or on your own), e-mail me at chris@roguerunning.com and I will keep you updated on the latest developments, including training options through Rogue and through our Rogue Lemons group at Lululemon.

Also, I would highly encourage you to sign-up for the race NOW as it will sell out quickly. Stop thinking. Just register. We will help provide travel options and information later, including details on the charter if we can make it happen. You can register here.

Did I mention that the average temperature for Vancouver in August is 63 degrees?!?

If you’re still on the fence, watch this video:

Screen shot 2013-01-22 at 12.05.49 PM

chris mcclung

Chris is currently coaching a group training for the Austin Marathon and will begin coaching a group to train for summer half marathons on March 2nd (including SeaWheeze). If you are interested in that program, click here.

 

The Best Running Shoes of 2012

by John Schrup

These are the running shoes in 2012 that are worthy of the Rogue Wall.  Yeah, we have our opinions.  For example:  We are of the opinion that the sun rises in the east.  So, there.  We are also of the opinion that your running shoes should be the least of your worries.  The right shoe for you is the least amount of shoe you are comfortable wearing – the one that disappears the second you put it on.

Our Top Five Six

adidas Adios 2

This is the shoe that was the reason for creating these awards.  Actually, the original Adios got this award—the yellow with black one that we first saw on Haile’s feet, or red or green that came after, whichever.  When you wore that shoe, everything was right with the world.  If you were to visit the Middle East, the ambient music would be “It’s a Small World.”  Republicans and Democrats would argue only over which one loves the other the most, sorta like googly-eyed high school kids with their first, you know.   You’d PR in everything—everything!   10K.  Breakfast.  Home Depot.  Lunges.  Socks.  Whatever.  Adidas are making a big push to regain some of their lost glory—and they’re doing a pretty good job of it—and their shoes will come around even more when they drop that maha-sucky Formotion piece.  It is no coincidence that the best adidas running shoes don’t have the Formotion shit on them.  The Adios is easily—easily!—adidas’ best shoe, and it is also easily—easily!—one of the best shoes you can buy.  The responsiveness is the first thing you notice.  One guy in the group who used to be in lurve with the Vomero has been seen in the A2, and was heard saying something along the lines of  “**** these things feel fast!”  (Alliteration!) When I’m running through the Brentview in my Adios, all the cats and dogs in the neighborhood stop what they’re doing and bring their favorite squeaky toys out to the curb as offerings.  Old school street cred.

Saucony Kinvara 3

You know how we love this shoe.  Yeah, we’d firm ‘em up a smidge, but other than that, the Kinvara are the shit. And now that we’re on that subject, if the K3 felt more like the Mirage (or Adios) in firmnessicity it would pretty much be all I would wear.   You could argue that this is the shoe that brought lower offsets to the mainstream.  I’m not going to use the M word, because, like, that’s not the kind of people we are, but that too.  Uber-light, protective, moderately flexible, the K3 is for training, for racing, for long walks on the beach—doesn’t matter. I’ve noticed that when I wear the Kinvara and then afterward go to the Central Market for the, you know, groceries, I’m much more likely to have someone ask me where I got my hair done.  They’re that good.  If the Kinvara were running for office and they had a debate, the Kinvara would wait until its opponent stopped talking, lean in to the mic and say, “Awesome.”  And the election would be over.   Also, the A5 should be renamed the Kinvara Racer.

New Balance 1600 

Just, wow.  New Balance is like one of those sports teams that you watch in your favorite professional league that sits at the bottom of their conference for so long that people are like, We have a professional sports team?  Really?  Hm.  And so then the owner gets tired of having to pick hair out of his dinner at fancy restaurants because the chef hates him so much, so he goes out and buys a whole new team.  I don’t know about the first thing, but NB definitely bought a new team.  New designers, new marketers, all that shit.  And now they are making some of the very best stuff available.  We’re big fans of their decision to reduce offsets from 12 to 8, because it is the right thing to do.  They’ve got a boss lineup of the 890, the 1400 and the 1600.  There might not be a better trio on the wall.  We like the 1600 the best because we like things that are awesome, despite our obvious efforts to prove otherwise.  You can train in it, race in it, whatever.  The fit is mmmmmmm, sexy snug.  Mama like!  It is almost exactly what a running shoe should be, and nothing more.  The only thing I’d change is the EVA;  I’d make the midsole firmer, but I ain’t complainin’.  You wear this shoe and you could be a half ton, smoke seven packs of Camel unfiltered a day, wear P. Terry’s Cologne and produce enough personal natural gas that Russian oil companies would be all up in your shizz wanting to frack you and you’d still be moving like a bat out of Hades.  The 1400 probably has a broader appeal, but the 1600 is definitely one of the 2012 shoes.  I would blindfold these bad girls and feed them truffles, like in that movie with those people in that language.  You know the one, with the words on the bottom.

Brooks Launch 

You knew this one would be on the list.  It was introduced back in 2009, and since then has been the best shoe on the wall.  Feed us enough espresso and we might even tell you that this is the shoe of the decade—both of them.  They aren’t minimalist, except that the midsole has been stripped of anything unnecessary, so don’t go calling us a minimalist store.    At the moment, you won’t find anything smoother on the wall or on the road.  When it was announced that the Launch was to be discontinued, well, I don’t want to call it chaos, but shit was ****ed up.  Women in the streets rending their Lululemon.  I know!  Seriously!  Mass jaywalking.  There were no breakfast tacos to be found—anywhere.  Pemberton Heights, 12th and Chicon, same difference.  Texas became the first state to make veganism the official religion.  Like I just said, shit was ****ed up!    The design of the Launch reminds us of days before people missed workouts because their Garmin wasn’t charged; before people took gels on a 5 mile run; before people gave a shit about over-pronation.  At the same time, the Launch are what most minimalist… err biomechanically appropriate… shoes should be, albeit maybe with a higher offset.  But you know what we’re talking about.  They’re foam, with complete ground contact.  Brooks, the number one brand at running specialty now, are dropping the Launch from their lineup, because Brooks believe that you can’t make a good running shoe without actually ****ing it up first, er, I mean adding a bunch of technology to it.  I love this shoe and I don’t even wear it.  We were so upset by the news that we built a makeshift grave site to mock Brooks.  Then, several months later, Luke’s did the same thing, completely trumping us in creativity and absurd displays of sadness.

ASICS Tarther

The Tarther, like the Launch, are no mas.  ASICS, in their infinite wisdom, and by wisdom I mean obtuseness, pulled the plug on the Tarther after one year because, well, we don’t know why.  You can still get them in Europe, so um, yeah.  But we’re gonna assume and speculate all over the place.  They didn’t sell well enough to get traction or there wasn’t enough “science” behind them, and by “science” I mean features that are easily marketable.  I’m going to go out there and say that the simplicity of this beautiful shoe is such that they went over the head of the American market, or of ASICS marketing team, whichever.  If something is that basic, it can’t be any good, no?  Like Brooks, ASICS didn’t want to put marketing dollars into a shoe that doesn’t have any marketability, other than being a superior shoe.  The Tarther were marathon racers here in the US, which means that we love it, sometimes publically and mostly inappropriately.  Did you ever notice that the Tarther and the original Adios were almost identical?  It’s true.  Both designed in the Japanese market, marathon racers, similar responsiveness, ride, fit.  Yep.  It’s no wonder our pants feel funny when we wear these shoes.  I could continue ragging ASICS for yanking that shit, but instead I’ll just say, thank you for the opportunity to have run in the Tarther.

Newton

Wait, wait wait!  Hear me out!  I know, I know, I know.  WTFF?  Yeah, it took us three years to bring Newton in, and believe me, it coulda been longer.  When Newton first came to us red flags went up right away, and maybe it had something to do with the whole triathlete, you know, thing.  I don’t know.  Or the lugs thing.  But when we sat down with Newton to talk about it, they were the only group who would or could actually talk about running as the context for the shoe, rather than the other way around.  Most reps you talk to about shoes can’t tell you anything other than what they memorized from their sales meetings and the answers we get don’t get much deeper than the ol’, “Well, it’s one louder, isn’t it?”  Yeah, the shoes are pricey; yeah they take some time to get familiar with; yeah the lugs are a little, I don’t know, weird.  But the more I think about it, the more I like that they are focusing on the forefoot for their technology, rather than the rearfoot.  We’re always down for the road less traveled, new design paradigms1, thinking outside the bush.  Did they get it right?  Dunno yet.  They fit like a sock/glove/second skin and once you get used to the feel of the lugs underfoot and recognize that, hmmm, they feel more like a really firm forefoot than the gooey marshmallows we’re used to, it’s a quite nice feel.  The other thing we like about Newton is that they are honest about what is marketing and what isn’t.  And in the running shoe biz, when you call someone out on that, they just get all defensive on you and say something like “We’re all an experiment of one,” or something equally as obtuse and dismissive.  Newton make a line of shoes from racer to lightweight to less lightweight to clunky, but the only models you need to know are the Distance (because we’re assholes) and the Gravity, which is the Distance with some rubber on the heel.  Subtle Chuck, who was the most vocal dissenter when a show of hands was requested about bringing in the Newtons, is now the most hyper proponent of the brand.  And that’s saying a lot because Subtle C still thinks that all music everywhere stopped after Terrapin Station.

Our Honorable Mention Awards 

Shoe most likely to be seen in a parking lot or on Arthur Lydiard’s feet, if he were alive and endorsed it, neither of which is true:  INOV-8 f-lite 195

Once upon a time, oh, about 2005 I think, INOV-8 came across the pond from the UK of England and was known only for making low-profile trail shoes.  These days, INOV-8 are known for, probably, Crossfit.  If you’re not familiar with Crossfit, it is a relatively new exercise program thing whereby you eat live animals regularly and throw giant truck tires and jump over your own barf because you just did, like, 9000 prisoner squats, and the catch is you have to do it in a parking lot on a busy street so everyone driving by can see you.  If you don’t do it in the parking lot, it’s called heavy construction work or sometimes farming.  Anyway, INOV-8 are the shoe of choice for the Crossfitters, because they believe in functional, fundamental strength work—I like ‘em already!—and shoes that are more minimaler than your traditional running shoe allow for a greater, more natural range of movement, which everyone except podiatrists believe is a good thing.  But they’re running shoes to me, except for the ones now labeled Crossfit or whatever, and they are what I think Lydiard would like, except he’d want them in beige or maybe black because of the whole New Zealand thing.   Just about the simplest uppers on the wall, they fit like, you know; and nothing but EVA underfoot with some rubber for gription making them light, protective and flexible.  They come in three or four offsets, so you can fit the whole family.  We think INOV-8 are getting a little cocky, because the most recent catalog we were given has way too many models for a company so small and so young.  But they make cool looking, great fitting, smooth as silk road and trails shoes and thus far, the 195 is the best of all that.  3mm offset (not that it matters), super simple upper, foam, rubber.   Cheerio.

Best Bloop for the Buck:  Nike Pegasus 29

Oh, man.  If ever a model had some history in the running market, this is it.  Through so many different incarnations (remember the polyurethane?), the Peg have always filled a spot in the, let’s call it “lower end” of the neutral/cushion category.  And by lower end I mean that it never had all the bling and superfluous crap that so many shoes have these days.  It usually stood about $15-$20 lower on the scale than other models, yet in our opinion was probably better than the luxury end stuff.  The 29th incarnation is one of the best, though we still think it is going the opposite direction it needs to travel.  The fit is as good as it gets:  The knit upper is so light and unobtrusive that it almost feels as if it is on the wrong midsole/outsole combination; the upper feels like what I want racing flats to feel like.  But then we get to the midsole/outsole.  It kinda makes my heart hurt, if you want to know the truth.  When I take these Pegs for a spin, I want so badly to love them and for them to love me back.  It’s like the ultimate dysfunctional relationship, isn’t it?  If you look up the word “bloop” in the Oxford English Dictionary, there is a picture of the Peg 29.  M’er F’er bloop.  There is almost no ground feel whatsoever.  But, hey, not that there’s anything wrong with that, right?  I mean, like, no ground feel.  You’re a couple inches off the ground when you put these bad girls on.  Platforms.  New York Dolls and shit.  But it does retain some nice rear-fore transition because of the complete ground contact.  One guy sent me an email or Facebook message or something espousing his profound love for this shoe—his favorite shoe everrrrrrrr—and I didn’t argue with him.  He likes it.  He’s also super efficient and fast and couldn’t tip the scales on a can of Pringles.  But that is less important than almost anything perhaps.  Dude just likes his Pegs.  For the type of shoe it is, the Peg is maybe the best.

They Should Rename This Shoe the Phoenix:  Saucony Ride

This shoe used to be, and please excuse in advance the vulgarities that follow, a ****ing piece of ****.  Really, it was bad.  No, I mean, you wouldn’t get projectile compound fractures or anything, but it was pretty archaic in just about all ways.  It was, let’s face it, ugly.  And it was heavy.  And it was inflexible.  And the fit was, depending on the model, alternately poor and bad.  So when Saucony decided to get with the times and lower the heel/toe offset from 12mm to 8mm, well, it didn’t solve any of the problems in, like, Darfur or someplace, but it was a positive move.  But this new Ride is light, fits well in that old Saucony way, and is much, much smoother than the old, tired, worn out version.  Ok, ok, there’s still the issue with that midfoot truss, which is not only entirely unnecessary, but unsightly and probably unethical. Nevertheless, we’re awarding the Ride with this, um, award because it’s done a complete 360.  Wait.  180.  270?  Dang. Translation: we like it.

Ghost Killa:  Also the… Saucony Ride

Ok, so here’s what happened.  There used to be this shoe that Brooks made called the Burn.  Shoe was bad ass.  The first version was pretty good, you know, not bad.  But the second version rocked your face off.  Shit was awesome!  I had a couple pair of them back in the day, or 2006 or whatever, and ran many a fine mile (or kilometer, for you Canadiites) up and down the ditches of the Albuquerque Valley.  Man!  Loved that shoe!  And then it went away—pulled from the lineup—probably  because it had everything that is a good running shoe needs, and nothing a good marketing person wants.  So, sort of tacitly, we were told that the Ghost was the replacement for the Burn.  Yeah, um, no.  Not really.  That first version was as close as it got, but that was still more of a sortakindanotreally lightweight trainer.  It was a little bit lower profile that what you see now, and firmer, and if memory serves and it rarely does, it felt faster.   And then the Launch came in and pushed the Ghost into the gordosphere.  Which, for Brooks, is alright because it is the best selling shoe they have that isn’t an Adrenaline.   Indeed, it is everyperson’s shoe.  Not really remarkable except that you put it on and immediately want to sit down with your non-fat soy latte (huh?) with your flat front khakis while you pretend to read Dwell in your neighborhood Starbucks.  Sold the M’er F’er outta those things.  We did.

And so when Saucony bringed out the new Ride, we deemed it the Ghost Killa.  Everything (almost everything, anyway) that we wanted to change about the Ghost, Saucony beat us to it.  Pretty quickly the Ride began to eat up the Ghost numbers here at the Rogue.  In our own Pepsi Challenge of Shoes, the Ghost on one foot, the Ride on the other, and without any prompting other than cash incentives, the Ride won out.  I know, right?  Not that we have anything against the Ghost, except that it appears to be heading in the exact opposite direction we want shoes to go.  And the Ride happens to be heading in the Rogue Approved direction.

Shoe most likely to be worn to get sex from someone who didn’t care that you leave your shoes on during sex: adidas gazelle

This is a shoe that you could take to Vegas, wear to the club on Friday night, rock the bottle service, get into all kinds of Hangover-like shenanigans…  And then, when you wake up on a mattress on the roof, you might be otherwise naked, but you’d have the nicest, smoothest, nirvana of a recovery jog around the roof perimeter until someone comes and gets you down. So, get’em now since, you know, we’re the only store in the country that has them until January. And, you’ve got lots of partying to do before then.

Best upper on a shoe that is already dead: Mizuno Wave Precision

We write this entry with just a bit of sadness.  Not a sadness that would be outwardly visible to others, I don’t know maybe the kind of sadness you have when your favorite drawers—the ones you’ve had since undergrad—blow a hole and you have to hide them from the person you share a bed with because you know they’ll throw that shit out.  The thing about the Precision is that they have almost always been a good shoe, but this latest incarnation became a really good shoe; they were what they’ve wanted since it was introduced.  They look great, have almost nothing that you don’t need, and the fit is the shit.  The fit is as clean as a Waffle House bathroom and the familiar Mizuno feel is still there.  You like this shoe?  Yeah?  So sorry.  Gone.  Gone.  All gone.  Don’t panic yet… we’ll have them through next July, but next year the Precision will be a part of history, replaced by the awkwardly named Wave Sayonara.  Knowing all this, the Sayonara should be a bitchin shoe, but there will be many of you who will find need to buy, like, nine pair of Precision because they are the best shoe everrrrrrrrr.

Best Trail Shoe Period:  New Balance MT110

Yeah, you care about this one.  Because you run on trails all the time, eating your hummus wraps that Jurek told you about and using your wool socks to wipe your ass.  You know how to filter the water of Barton Creek so that you don’t get Ebola or whatever.  And when you get back in your Outback L.L. Bean Edition to drive the two miles back from the trail head, you recover with grass fed salmon jerky and a chia recovery drink from the Ho Foo.  I don’t know what all that means, but I do now that this shoe will rock your face off and leave you thinking someone fed you bath salts.  I don’t know what that means either.  The 110 is pretty much the archetype of the modern trail shoe:  Low profile, protective, flexible, laser proof, speaks four languages fluently, uses the degree it took from undergrad, is kind to animals and has the Dalai Lama on speed dial.  The Cascadia might be the best selling trail shoe, but the people who buy that one are also the ones who keep their ski lift tags on their winter jacket so you know where they went skiing (A Basin).

Best Shoe That’s Aaaalllmost there…

When I first put the ASICS Gel Lyte on, the first thing that popped into my head was, “GD!  I’m gonna like this shoe!”  You need to read that as if it sounds like disappointment, rather than as an exultation.  Like, Awwww, maaaan….That kind of thing.  Like a kid would sound, a little whiney, when you reneg on the bribe to take them to Amy’s for a scoop if they mow the park.  ASICS has for the last decade or so been the shoe that most of the running population wore.  They are known for shoes like the Kayano, the Nimbus and the 2000 series, which is interesting because at least two of those we don’t really think of as running shoes, per se, but more like fashion shoes for people who want you to think they run.  Today, for example when I was at the Ho Foo down there on the corner, while standing in line to pay for my Fuji, fresh young coconut, avocado and organic macadamia butter Ezekiel wrap, I counted no less than nine or eleven Kayanos on the feet of rather lean Lululemon pant wearing females.  None of these Kayanos had any sort of dust or other contaminant on them.  They are sort of the Lunarglide for the Real Housewives of Travis County or whatever.

But the Lyte was, at first, brilliant.  Firm, flexible, light, low.  Praise Allah!  But then I ran in them for a week or so, and realized that the upper is severely lacking.  It was on the narrow side.  And when I say narrow, I mean I feel like I’m a 19th century Asian woman.  On me anyways.  With my narrow feet.  I know of several people who think the fit is awesome.  Perfetto, the French say.  But I take the insoles out of all my shoes, so the fit is actually ok.

This shoe had the potential to be a sort of saving grace for the whole Tarther, you know, thing.  Though nowhere near as impressive as the Tarther, the Lyte was something kinda like when your server totally  ****s up your order, but then gives you, like, a free flan after and you go, yeah, ok, that’s cool.

The good news—or the weird news, depending on how you’re gonna look at it—is that the Lyte is being replaced.  By the…wait for it…Lyte Part Deux.  It’s still pretty low, pretty light, but now the upper is going to fit much cleaner, many more people, and not make you feel like you’re being punished.  On the other coin, the midsole outsole now will have multiple densities, which doesn’t mean much if you’re not into, you know, performance.  The gooder news is that the price goes down $10.  Which tells you that ASICS is telling you which shoe to buy.  Hm.  Kinda like them dropping the Hyperspeed, at $80, and replacing it with the Noosafast, which is a Hyperspeed with kangaroos or some shit painted on them, at $100.  The 2d pair of laces are the extra $20, apparently.

And so, ladies and gentlemen, in conclusion, if you’re worried that you might be in the wrong running shoes, maybe you should go to the zen center, do some yoga or yardwork or some shit, and quit worrying so much.  It’s running, man, it ain’t Gaza.  JFR.  Also, the Big John cookies at Ho Foo are awesome.

1I just wanted you all to recognize that I used the word paradigm here.   Thanks.

Check it:  For those of you who fancy yourself a dedicated runner, a dedicated marathoner, who wants to find out what you’re made of, John coaches Team Rogue on T, Th mornings at 5:30.

Offwhat?

by John Schrup

For those of you who consider such things, may we present to you an incomplete list of some of the footwear available on the Rogue Wall and their offsets.  The offset, or differential, or drop, or ramp or whateverthe**** you want to call it, is the difference in millimeters between the height of the foam under the heel and under the forefoot.  Each company measures a bit differently, and offset is not to be confused with stack height, which is the total height of all the stuff under your foot—outsole, midsole, insert.  So stack height can be upwards of 10mm higher, if you’re looking at a really high end luxury shoe.

Just because a shoe has a lower offset doesn’t mean the shoe is going to be smoother, though that help a bit.  We have several models in our quiver with higher offsets, and they are as smooth or smoother than shoes with lower offsets.  For example, the Adios is 9mm, and it is way smoother that the Pure Flow, which is a full 5mm lower.  Similarly, not all shoes with the same offset are going to feel the same.  The Launch, the men’s Nimbus and the Dyad all come in at 10mm, yet feel way, way different.  There are so many other variables to consider—weight, durometer (the firmness of the shoe), whether there is any proprietary drop in (superfluous) cushioning or midfoot truss, the fit of the shoe—that it won’t do you any good to buy a shoe just because it has a lower or higher offset.  In the same way that we once chose shoes based on arch height and stuff like that.

Generally, we prefer lighter and lower.  But you might not.  You could be running in an Ariel with a rigid plastic orthotic and that might be the least amount of shoe you are comfortable with.  So go with that.  As a rule:  If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

All of this—these numbers that really don’t mean much in the end—is considerably less important if your body is strong and resilient.  If you aren’t, ain’t no shoe in the world gonna do you a lick of good.  Note, too, that these numbers are as determined not by the maker of the shoe, but by independent testing, so the numbers might vary from what you’ve seen.

0mm
NB Trail00
NB Road00
K-Swiss Blade Foot
Mizuno EVO Cursoris (2013)
Brooks Pure Drift (2013)

3mm
INOV-8  195
Newton Distance

4mm
NB Trail110
Saucony Kinvara
Saucony Kinvara TR
Brooks Pure Flow
adidas adipure Adapt

5mm
adidas Hagio
NB Road10
Brooks Pure Connect
Brooks Pure Cadence
Saucony Mirage
Newton Gravity

6mm
INOV-8 230
ASICS Gel Lyte33
adidas adipure Gazelle
NB1600

8mm
Saucony Ride
Saucony Triumph
adidas adipure Motion
NB 890
NB 870

9mm
adidas Adios
Mizuno Wave Musha
Brooks Ravenna

10mm
adidas Feather
ASICS Tarther
ASICS DS Trainer
ASICS M Nimbus
ASICS GT2000
ASICS Excel33
Brooks Dyad
Brooks Launch
Brooks Cascadia

11mm
Brooks Ghost
NB 1400

12mm
Mizuno Wave Rider
Mizuno Wave Elixir
Brooks Racer ST
Brooks Adrenaline
Nike Pegasus

13mm
Mizuno Wave Precision

Check it:  For those of you who fancy yourself a dedicated runner, a dedicated marathoner, who wants to find out what you’re made of, John coaches Team Rogue on T, Th mornings at 5:30.

My List

by John Schrup

Pretty soon in this space you’ll see a list of the Best Rogue Shoes of 2012.  We probably should have named it something with a better hook, but we’re doing our lunge matrix right now, so time is limited.  It seems to me that every year about this time, shortly after the high temperatures drop to double digits and the Starbucks puts up its Christmas tree, we get lists of all the things that the past year has broughten us.  I blame David Letterman.

So my list isn’t really a list, rather just a space to tell you what shoes I wear regularly in my rotation.  I have, I don’t know, maybe a dozen or so pair that I wear.  Some more than others.  Some rarely, kinda like when you’re going through your high school yearbook and you go, Hm, wonder what she’s been doing.  But there are, like, five pair that I rotate pretty regularly.  I’m going to give them to you here and now because, you know, I’ve had coffee.   A quick glance in the back seat of the Yaris gives us this:

 Saucony A5:  Technically, Saucony’s race flat.  They should call it the Kinvara Racer because it would make more sense in terms of branding and, you know, sounding better.  These bad girls are tight!  Not fit wise, but you know what I’m talking about.  If I were talking about tight fit, I’d talk about the Gloria Vanderbilt jeans Jill Strelsky wore when we went to see The Devil and Max Devlin back in the day.  I’m not going to tell you how old I was when that happened, but I will tell you I remember being pretty excited because that year in school we got to use the lined paper that didn’t have the little training wheel dashes between the big lines.  So, um, yeah.   Not only was she hot, but girl was ****ing awesome in the four square tournaments at lunch.  Anyway, Sauncony A5 because it is light, low and feels like Jill’s jeans look.

adidas Adios 2:  Even though it would appear that the A2 goes against     everything I look for in a shoe–it ain’t particularly low, nor flexible, it’s got all kinds of shit in the midsole–when I put these things on to run I can vote retroactively and the TSA people get in line to frisk me.  They are the most beautifully firm shoe I’ve ever worn.  I’ve got two or three other pair with similar offsets, but none feel as fast as these do.  If you were to chart the awesomeness of these shoes, I’d let you, and then I’d do venn diagram of it.   I’ve got my fingers crossed that the bottle lands on the original Adios, since they’re way sexier, but these are worthy of a shared visit to the closet, totally.  I bet though that when the Takumi Sen comes out, my A2′s become that kid at the party who fiddles around with all the stereo equipment because no one picks them to make out.

 

Ok, so it appears that I’m stuck somewhere back in the early 80′s, if we go by the content of the first two on the list.  Let’s fast forward to the mid-to late-80′s, if your brain cells go there.

Saucony Kinvara 3:  This shoe, at one point, was like that older girl you met in summer school who was really cool because she listened to PE when you were still singing “Abracadabra.”  She was ahead of her time, super sexy and you had to keep your shirt untucked when you ran/saw her in the hall.  Yeah, I’d make it a little firmer, but this shoe disappears on your foot, and that’s pretty much what a shoe is supposed to do, so I’m not complaining.  If the K3 had the firmness of the A2, holy crap, I’d totally get arrested for the things I’m thinking right now.  Or maybe applauded, I don’t know your background.

New Balance 1600:  Not too long ago, this would have been the 1400.  But then the 1600 came out, and so you drop the first one for the roommate, and the first one starts driving by your place when the roommate is there, even though you live like nine miles from campus and then the first one comes up to you in front of the administration building when you’re on your way to the sorority thing in the Pub and she gets all in your face and you can tell she’s had a drink or two and then she grabs your tie and tries to throw you to the ground but you do one of those Matrix moves and get out of it and then have to file a police report and then you stick with the 1600, because it is sexier, anyway.

Wow.  I’m reliving the glory days, it would seem.  Since there are only four pair of shoes in the Yaris right now, the fifth one would have to be:

adidas Rocket:  You thought I was going to say the Hagio, dintcha?  Nope.   I’ve got a stash of the Rocket in the living room closet.  It is pretty old school, especially when compared to the Hagio, which is all dépêche mode and shit, but it is smoother, doesn’t make that slappy sound when you’re breaking it in, and the upper is way more better.  The Rocket is like that guy you knew who was pretty much everything you ever wanted in a boyfriend, but just couldn’t pull the trigger because he looked like an Alfred E. Newman/arachnid hybrid.  Performs at the highest level, is everything you want, super awesome on all fronts, except that you just don’t completely dig it on a count of the whole, you know, ugly thing.  I’m going to say it again:  When the Takumi Sen arrives, even the Rocket is gonna be all, Why don’t you return my messages anymore?

Check it:  For those of you who fancy yourself a dedicated runner, a dedicated marathoner, who wants to find out what you’re made of, John coaches Team Rogue on T, Th mornings at 5:30.

Review: 2nd Surge Ultra Energy Gel

by Joel Stanford

Before I bore you with my deeper thoughts on this product, let me tell you about my general impressions.  The first time I consumed one of these was on a trail loop Erik Stanley had me and my fellow Off Rogues plowing through.  The circuit, which ranges across the far western ends of the Barton Greenbelt is the very definition of hilly, rocky, and punishing.  I was 13 miles into a 20 mile run, monstrously hungry from a lack of breakfast, tired of all the hills, and having lustful thoughts about the silver package of life sustaining sugars nestled in my handheld’s pocket.  Relenting to temptation (and against Schrup’s sage advice on avoiding gels in training), I greedily tore off the top of the package while pounding down yet another hill and squeezed a bit into my mouth.  My eyes widened, my taste buds sang happily, and I began to claw desperately at the packaging, squeezing out every last drop.  Imagine the taste of incredibly delicious dark chocolate cupcake frosting blended with mermaid tears, or the sensations of drinking lustily from Willy Wonka’s chocolate river.  The taste and consistency was the best I’ve had in a gel.  Granted, hunger makes everything taste better, but these are light years beyond the thick, nausea inducing gels of every runner’s dismay.  The thin consistency (more of a liquid than a gel), the saltiness, and the dark chocolate flavor profile are fantastic.  After about 15 minutes the sugars and caffeine whomped into my system in a very satisfactory manner, and I eagerly burned through the rest of the run.  Subsequent tests on a 23 mile trail run (I consumed two packets over the course of this), and on a 30.5 mile road run (one packet at mile 14, and one fruit bar at mile 20 – I felt absolutely fantastic throughout) cemented my impressions that this is a solid, very delicious, and functional product.  The protein component leaves tiny bit of chalk on the back of the throat, but this is quickly dispatched with a swig of water.

So what’s up with this product, and why is it twice as costly as other gels?

If you’re shopping for a more robust energy gel, there are limited options out there beyond the basic long chain/short chain sugar blends that are so common (Gu, Accel, Clif, and so forth).  A burgeoning category, notably explored by Gu with their Roctane gels is that of an energy gel with a bit of protein or amino acids thrown in.  Sports drinks have existed for some time with protein in them, but outside of the ultra running set, these typically aren’t used in race or training situations, but rather for recovery.  The science on these remains vague and a bit sketchy (witness Gu’s claims about Roctane), but it does make sense that one could perhaps utilize small amounts of protein during very long endurance events where your body has a long time to break down what you’re giving it.  It always helps to have a basis of comparison, and for the purposes of this review, Roctane seems the closest competitor in terms of claims, composition, and price. Gu goes for individual amino acids (plus a high sodium content), while 2nd Surge goes sledgehammer route with complete proteins – which could also potentially be a bit less digestible.  The amount of protein in 2nd Surge is equivalent to that found in a tablespoon of Peanut Butter (a fantastic pre-run snack in small amounts).

Upon receiving my review package of these gels from Rogue, I turned the box over, scanned the ingredients, and then winced a bit.  The claim?  The gels prominently display the words “all natural” on the box and individual packets.  The reality?  The first ingredient is agave nectar, which is actually very similar to corn syrup both in terms of the amount of chemical wizardry and processing that goes into it, and the ratios of fructose and glucose (never mind the marketing).  Nevertheless, the nutritional profile of the gels are intriguing.  There are three different sugar ingredients – including the long chain sugars (brown rice syrup) that are so important in terms of sustained energy, and the shorter chain hummingbird fuels agave nectar (fructose and glucose), and common cane sugar.  What does all of this mean?  If you’re sensitive to sugar spikes, you might want to stay away.  This product has a higher amount of simple sugars than many of its competitors, and some have complained of a spike/crash after consuming it.

It seems that this is marketed as a race day product, but I personally would only recommend it for marathon distances, grueling runs greater than 3 hours, or ultras (where that protein could be a lifesaver).  In those situations, I think this is a unique and very desirable product, particularly from the aforementioned taste and texture perspective.

Pros: Taste, texture, viscosity, and the intriguing inclusion of a bit of protein.  Highly unique. Zero digestibility issues for this tester, and it really did seem to “stick to my ribs”, in that I didn’t have hunger sensations as quickly as I do with other gels.

Cons: Mr. Schrup will be very angry if you use this during training. The caffeine content is almost obscenely high at 100MG (crashing non-addicts like myself into a wall of fatigue hours after a 2 packet run had ended). They aren’t really “natural”, and the included “antioxidant blend” won’t help you one bit.

Review: Asics GT 2000

by John Schrup

I know.  I had to.

The GT series has been one of the most popular running shoes across the globe for more than a decade.  It’s like a Toyota Camry, except shoes.  Never flashy or remarkable other than the consistency, with a minor tweak here or there.  ASICS are finally forced to change what once was the archetypal stability running shoe due to market pressures to go lighter, leaner, blingier.  Okay, let’s not use the word change, because that’s for politicians; instead let’s use the word “repackage.”

Back in the day, or 1996, one of my all-time favorite shoes, the ASICS GT 2020 was the shit.  Ugly as all get out, at least by today’s standards—it was all white with just enough of the black accenting so that it didn’t look like the shoes you wear when you go get your Luann at the Luby’s over there.  I can’t really remember what I liked about them, because those were the “Are you gonna finish that drink?” years.  I remember feeling very fast in them, that they fit right on the money and it was the first pair of stability shoes I ever had, because some dude in the running shop back home looked at my flat ass feet and told me I needed them.  So, yeah.  Pretty sure it was mostly the fit that I liked, which ASICS promptly screwed up with the 2030 when they narrowed the toe box.  Remember those?  With the blue and yellow.

Anyway, I forgot about the 2020’s for years, ‘til round about ’01-’02 or thereabouts when I got a pair of the Puma that were bad to the ass.  The Complete Pryde II or something like that.  It was basically the 2020, with the Puma logo and it was navy.  I loved the shit out of that shoe.  I don’t know why you needed to know that, but there you go.

Over the years, BA (Before Adrenaline) the GT series became the number one shoe on the planet.  All those years we believed that we needed stability shoes because we were told by people who were thought to know stuff.  As a general rule.  Like, more than 75% of the population wore stability shoes.  But because ASICS tends to respond to the market on the, you know, slow side, and people started asking for and buying into the new generation of running shoes, the GT lost some street cred.

Which brings us to now:  The GT 2000.  The lighter, more colorful 20whateverweareatnow.   ASICS removed some weight—good, good—and made some midsole/outsole changes that make them feel a bit smoother, but it is really more of a repackaging than a change.  It’s kinda like the forty-something regular to average guy who gets divorced and then the next time you see him he’s wearing skinny jeans and a Count Chocula tshirt or some shit.  The pair I’ve been wearing—no, the shoes, not the jeans—is lime green with some red, is pretty unASICS-like, so that’s good.  The fit is the best part of these bad mamajamas.  Glove-a-licious.  New welded overlays make for a light, snug fit.  They’ve retained some of the responsiveness that made them favorites among the faster crowd—at least, at one time—except now you can really feel the pillowtop they’ve added to the midsole.  So it’s got nice step in feel, but once you get running, they’re decently responsive.  Still feels like I’m wearing KISS boots though.  (Maybe that’s a better analogy:  Once top of the charts rockers get rebranded for their reunion tour!)

Anyway, if you’ve been a fan of the GTs, you’ll be an even bigger fan of these.  ASICS knows better than to mess with something that’s worked well for so long, but recognizes that everything changes and the time for a change is now, and by now I mean like 5 years ago.  I know tons of people who swear by the GTs and they’re going to see this model as the best of the bunch.