Review: Kinvara Trail

 

 

 

 

by John Schrup

I don’t always run in trail shoes.  But when I do, I run in the Kinvara TR.

No.  No I don’t.  Well, sort of.  I mean, the only time I wear trail shoes any more is when I’m back in NM and it’s mud season.  I left some original INOV-8′s at my father’s house, back in the day.  Oh man, I miss those shoes.

You all know I’m a big fan of the Kinvara 3.  And you all know that if it were a wee bit firmer, it would be the greatest shoe in the history of mankind, except for this pair of high top Chuck Taylors I had back in freshman year of high school that I wore to Black Flag at Circle A Ranch.  I spilled some Bartles & Jaymes or something on ‘em, which shouldn’t surprise anyone.  When I was a freshman in high school, I looked like a tall fetus.  I was a late bloomer.

Anyway, the Kinvara is a good shoe for a broad spectrum of people, much like the Launch, much like the Adios.  Each of these shoes could be improved, but don’t really need to be.  They are about as good as they get.  Different shoes, to be sure, but all legit.  I wish more companies would make shoes like these–good shoes for everyone; not so niche–and then build their running lines around them.  As it is, there are all these different shoes for this foot or that foot or whatever and the reality is that if they only made the, like, three or four shoes that were necessary, they wouldn’t make any money.

Saucony recognized a good thing and made the Kinvara TR.  The Kinvara is such a popular shoe that it was pretty much a sure thing that the TR was coming.

Word of warning:  You’ll want to wear it on the roads, but you probably shouldn’t.  Remember what I said about the K3 and firmness?  Yes’m.  Here ’tis.  The reason that it really won’t transfer well to roads is that you’ve got this tacky, lugged outsole that will just shear off when you put it to the asphalt.  The firmness is brought to you by a rockguard, which also reduces the flexibility of the forefoot a bit, though you won’t care because the weight and fit of the thing are so good that you’d forgive almost anything.  These bad girls are attached!  Ok, the forefoot could be a bit leesssssss snug, but they can fix that next go ’round.  Just like big sis/bro/whatever, the KTR has a low offset and fast feel.  If you are still of the mindset that a trail shoe should be a light hiker with some color to it, this shoe could be the mind changer.  The 3 was, for many, the introduction to “minimalism” whatever that means, and the TR could be the same deal here.  Saucony is firing on all cylinders.  They should change the name of the A5 to the Kinvara Racer, shouldn’t they?

So if you’ve not yet bought a pair of trail shoes because you haven’t yet run Pikes Peak, this is as good an introduction as any.  And some of the colors are cool too, so they got that going for them.  Which is nice.

Oh, please oh please, Saucony, combine the firmness of the TR with the rest of the 3.  Pretty please.  I’ll be your best friend.  I’ll give you…favors.  Please.  But that probably won’t happen because it would add weight to the shoe and from what the fine folks over there at the Saucony tell me, they don’t want to mess with that.  FTS!  Mess with it.  Add a half oz.  Please!!!

The List

by John Schrup

My eldest son, Isaac (three and a half/almost four/46 months/1395 days, give or take a few) has a solid understanding of gift giving.  As long as he’s the one on the receiving end, anyway.  Giving?  Not so much.  “You could get it for me for my birthday,” is a relatively common suggestion.  One day we practiced unwrapping presents, much, I suppose, in the same way we would practice running in progression or some shit.  We spent about an hour, me giving him things that he already owned—light sabers, plastic food, puzzle pieces—and he unwrapping the newspaper over and over and over, always with a well played display of surprise.  “Thanks, Papa!  Just what I’ve always wanted!”

At some point in these one-act plays, he’ll ask when, exactly, is his birthday again?  Can it be tomorrow?  He loves his presents, that kid.  There is an imaginary list that is updated regularly which contains all the things that he’s ever asked for.  “Just put it on the list.”  The other boy, Sam, has not a concept for gifts whatsoever, other than that things go in his mouth.

I tell you all this not to impress upon you in any way that my children are any different from any other children you have or know, because they are not.  It is not important that Isaac was, actually, the first child ever in the history of the planet to say, “Papa, look at me!” and then to fall down dramatically in a heap.

I tell you all this because I am making my very own list of things I want, and I need to share it with you.  What can I say?  I’m a giver.

My list is shoes.  Go figure.  There are several that I’m salivating over, and they aren’t even on the wall yet.   In January, some new models are due to arrive, and I’m pretty much so excited I’m in danger of wetting myself.  In public.  So don’t ask me about the new shoes if you see me in the Central Market.   This list I’m creating could end up being pretty extensive, but I’m only gonna give you a handful of them.  I’m doing this for your benefit, you know.  I’ve had a quad Americano and I’m afraid it’s gonna get wordy up in here.

Zero drop hits the masses.  When this whole “minimalist” thing began, Vibram was pretty much it as far as zero drop.  Now we’ve got almost everyone in the game and the result is some really nice stuff for you to run in.  These are really cushioned shoes with a zero offset, which means that the foot is essentially parallel to the ground.  Until now, most zero drop shoes were pretty thin and while they offered some really nice road feel, after several miles…ow ow ow!

 

Brooks Puredrift 

I know, right?  Brooks, best known for the Beast and the Adrenaline, gets real and introduces the fourth model in the Pure lineup.  The Drift fits snug through the midfoot and has a fairly roomy toe box so your tootsies can splay.  It will be superduper soft—in that ol’ familiar Brooks way—and will have the flexibility of a gymnast.  It will be kinda barefootish, but the softeness and the upwards curve of the forefoot (how the shoe is sprung) is a nod toward the mass market.  It’ll be like a house slipper made of cotton candy.

 

Saucony Virrata

You knew this bad girl was coming.  G’on, you knew.  Saucony has done wonderfully well with the Kinvara, creating one of the very best shoes on the wall.  Light, flexible, good fit.  Pretty much all you need in a shoe.  Our friends at Saucony already had a zero drop shoe, the Hattori, but the first version was a slip on, which is generally avoided by the masses, and it is pretty thin overall, so it bottoms out after about 50 miles.  The second incarnation has laces, but still it is going to work only as a supplementary option due to the lack of material underfoot.  Never fear, Virrata is here!  The Virrata is, in essence, a zero drop Kinvara.  It even looks like the K3.  It runs a bit softer, but with more than ample cushioning underfoot, so the zero drop will be more palatable for those of you willing to try.  If you are a FOK, you could be a FOV.

 

Mizuno Evo Levitas/Cursoris

Mizuno is, like ASICS, based in Japan, which means that adapting to market change takes a little longer.  You’ve got to go across the oceans to get an ok on something, after all.  And so Mizuno, like ASICS, has been a little late in keeping up with the trend toward lighter and lower.  Not that Mizuno hasn’t had those options—the Universe is a favorite in the Pose crowd—they just haven’t marketed them as such.  Do you find it a little strange, then, that Mizuno introduces two zero drop shoes concurrently before introducing anything else less polarizing?  A 4mm maybe?  I have to give them credit though, they’re also bringing over from Japan the Ekiden, a very popular racer that can be seen as a beefier Universe.   I might be more excited about that one!  And, forgive me for being a little picky, but the name Cursoris makes me feel a little nervous, a little dirty.  I don’t know why.   The Levitas is the more “minimal” of the two, which leads me to believe that the Cursoris will have a broader reach in the market.  Though at $120, compared to $110 for the Levitas, maybe not.

 

adidas Takumi Sen 

The Takumi Sen is not a zero drop shoe, but it doesn’t matter:  This shoe will make you change your political views.  Think of it as a finely constructed, lighter, lower, faster Adios.   With a 6mm offset, you’ll feel the ground but it won’t matter because you’ll be flying over it.  Designed by the godfather of Japanese shoe design, Mimura, who has designed shoes for just about everyone, including Olympic Gold Medalist Mizuki Noguchi, the Takumi Sen is the real deal all around racing flat—fast, light (4.6 oz. men’s 9) fast!  This shoe will make you faster.  It will clear up your skin.  You will have command over your native language.  It will give you confidence in front of a crowd. This shoe will melt your face off.

Put these on the list.

Check it:  For those of you who fancy yourself a dedicated runner, a dedicated marathoner, who wants to find out what you’re made of, John coaches Team Rogue on T, Th mornings at 5:30.

Shoe Boner Awards: The Trailer

by John Schrup

In a month or so, and by month we mean in the future, but before the end of the year, we’re going to release the Rogue Shoes of 2012:  The Shoe Boner Awards This list will include the very best shoes available by Rogue standards and presented to you in a way that only we can do it.  Which is to say that if you are running in a model that is not found on the list then, well, two words:  Dance off.

We must apologize in advance, because you will be offended, perhaps disgusted and because we can’t give you a more specific ETA on the SBA.   I’m behind schedule on several things, including laundry, due to the unfortunate encounter with the clam paneer at the Taco Delhi.  So you’ll see it when you see it.  I hope.  I’m still sweating.

What makes a shoe Rogue?  What makes a shoe worthy of The Wall at Rogue?  You mean, besides when you put them on and all of a sudden old ladies in track suits are frisking you in the HEB?  We like shoes that are simple designs, functional shoes.  That’s pretty much it.  We don’t go in for the bling, the “technologies” that are less technology and more, you know, stupid.  We tend to prefer shoes that might seem a little basic, a little old school.  We like shoes that allow you to do what you’re designed to do.   And we recognize that a shoe is only a small piece of the puzzle.  First you’ve gotta get fit, and we’re not talking V02 Max fit.  Structurally sound fit.  If you’re looking for the magic bullet, stop!  There ain’t one, except the one you see when you look in your mirror each morning for your daily affirmations.  Your running shoes are your most personalized tools.  If you’re thinking about them, noticing them when you’re running, then they aren’t doing you right.

You know the shoe is the right one for you when it is the one that disappears most on your foot.  It feels like an extension of your foot.  It feels most natural to you.  It is the one you notice least.  It is the one that you are intuitively drawn to.  It is easy to overthink the process because we have been taught that we need all kinds of stability or cushioning and all that shit.  No, no you don’t.  You know what you need, intuitively, you just have to learn how to recognize it.

So what are some things to look for in a shoe?  Well, several things. None of these are writ in stone, but they are great places to start.  We have noticed over the years, after fitting, like, bazillions of people and coaching almost that much, that the following design characteristics tend to work best for the widest variety of runners, , including you.  And if you think we are just going to list “minimalist” shoes, because we are a “minimalist” store, which I’ve heard several times in the last few weeks—in other cities, nonetheless—then you will get West Nile.  First, I don’t even know what that means, and B.) I’m pretty sure Donald Judd didn’t help with the build out of either store.  In your face!

Minimal overlays.  Most overlays are unnecessary.  They just are.  Most of them are there to make the shoe prettier, or more space shuttle-y, or something.  If a shoe is well designed and with good materials, there will be just enough up top to secure the shoe to the foot, and nothing more.

Lightweight.  With the resources, materials and talent that the shoe companies have these days, if your shoe is heavier than 10 oz. in men’s 9, or 8.5 oz. in women’s 7, they’re on the heavy side.  I know, right?

Flexible.  The shoe should be at least moderately flexible from heel to toe and from side to side.  Most feet are pretty flexible, and they are that way for a reason, for shock absorption, for propulsion.  If a shoe is too rigid or inflexible, it hinders the ability of the foot to do what it is supposed to do.  You’ll know if it isn’t flexible enough if you hear a slapping when your forefoot hits the ground or if your heel slips a bit at toe off.

Complete ground contact.  WTF is that?  Put your shoe, sole down, on the table or person in front of you.  From heel to toe you should see very little daylight along the point where the shoe meets the surface it is on.  You won’t find any midfoot trusses, just foam and rubber.  Complete ground contact makes the heel-toe transition much smoother, makes the shoe more inherently stable and, yep, lighter.  What does it look like?  Look at the Launch.  Classic example.  The 890/1400/1600?  Totally.  Pegasus?  Yes’m.

Lower offset.  Traditionally, the standard offset has been about 12mm.  That’s the difference in foam height between the heel and the ball of the foot.  There is endless argument about whether it makes a difference, or not.  Here’s how you know what works for you:  Try different heel heights.  Then you’ll know.  Almost invariably, people feel more comfortable in offsets that are lower than the traditional heights.  The shoes feel smoother, your gait feels smoother, your skin feels smoother.  I’m not going to go into the argument here, because I don’t have enough coffee for that, but I will say that our experiential information tells us that lower is better.  How low?  I don’t know, mofo.

Knowing all this, there will be someone who says, “Hey man. What’s up with the Adios 2?  That one’s got all the shit you don’t like on it.  WTF?”  Yes.  Yes it does.  And it is still bad ass.

Straight ballin’ EVA.  Proprietary cushioning technologies really don’t do much for you except give the shoe a certain feel, maybe add a hint of durability and that’s about it.  Straight EVA is so much smoother underfoot, you don’t even know!  It might seem a little far-fetched, but bounce with me here for a second:   I think if you have, like, three or four or five different densities, materials—whatever–under your foot, your nervous system is picking up on that, whether you notice it or not.  Now think about walking on a surface that is just one material—grass, concrete, dirt—and then compare that to walking on a surface that is a mix of a whole bunch of different things—twigs, rocks, grass, dirt.  Which one is smoother?  I know, right?  Ok, so that’s a terrible analogy.  I’m a terrible analogyist.

Hold your breath.  Shoe Boner Awards coming soon.

Dendoshi

by John Schrup

Now that I’m a well-seasoned traveler, having been in the last month to exotic destinations like The Republic of Boulder and Pine Mountain, Georgia, I’m pretty sure I’m an expert when it comes to hotels and how to stay in them.  I’ll give you two examples:  In Boulder we were put up in the St. Julien, which is so fancy that I should have known that no matter where I stayed next, it would be pretty much a hostel, except with complimentary shampoos.

Dendoshi: a fancy Japanese word for Here, Drink This.

Well, I was kinda wrong.  At this very moment—riiiiiiiiiiight now!—I’m on a chartered bus back to the airport in Atlanta, just having left the Mizuno Dendoshi, which is a fancy Japanese word for Here, Drink This.  Mizuno was very generous and put us up at the Lodge and Spa and Resort and Gathering Place at Callaway Gardens.  It’s a really spacious place dropped smack dab in the middle of the lushest, greenest, most fertile, most Deliverance place I’ve ever been.  Of course, being a resort, there are lake-y things and places where guys in expandapants play golf, but our only access to them was visual as we ran by.  So the place was really swanky.  But here I’m gonna go all asshole on you and sound like an ungrateful sumbitch, but this place was….well…how should I put this, um, diplomatically?  There is room for improvement in a couple of areas.  I’m going to tell you about them now.

One, I cannot overstate the importance of coffee in the hotel room.  It is more important than the, I don’t know, lighting.  Almost every hotel I’ve ever been in has one of those two stroke(1) coffee makers with either the little coffee pods or the coffee pouches (those things that look like those Copenhagen tobacco pouches that you tried once back in middle school, but made the unfortunate mistake of thinking it was supposed to be chewed and swallowed, and the gastrointestinal reaction was such that the next door neighbor heard the retching sounds, thought there was a murder in progress and called the cops).  You know what I’m talking about.  Those pouches.
Anyway, this place had the pouches.  I’m sorry.  The pouch.  The room had one pouch.  The whole purpose of the first cup of coffee is to make sure that you’re alert for the second cup of coffee.  I mean, really.  One pouch.  And the coffee itself, well, it tasted like it had been filtered through underwear.  It was not good.

Two, in most nicer hotels (and by nicer I mean places where you don’t have to put the sheets on the bed yourself) there can be found coffee dispensers throughout the hallways, meeting rooms, etc, etc.  It’ll have the attendant stirrers, sweeteners, creamy things, paper cups.  Essentially, if you find yourself in need of coffee, it is available.  It is available even if you don’t need it, which I don’t think could ever happen, ever, really, but you never know.  But here, at this place in Georgia, apparently they’ve gone all Bloomberg on the coffee.  You have to go to the restaurant to get coffee. Or to the front desk for more pouches, where they look at you like you just asked if they have any of the classy animal porn.  I don’t know anything about that.  I mean, we’re trying to have a conference here people!   Shit man.  Coffee!  So, my two gripes are basically because I didn’t have access to, you know, Deus ex caffeina.  In all fairness, the hotel did provide us Dendoshiers with coffee dispensers for the meetings, but that left whole periods of minutes when we weren’t in meetings where caffeine access was unavailable.

But, Dendoshi.  The conference.  The seminar.  The storytelling.  That’s what Dendoshi means in Japanese, storytelling.  We were there for Mizuno to tell us the Mizuno story.  The timing was good, for us anyway, since we were beginning to really wonder WTF was up with Mizuno, a perennial favorite among the core runner, as they had slipped in the ratings, so much so at Rogue as to barely register on the radar.  The Rider gets some play, but after the shitfest that was the Rider 14, people aren’t coming back to them as we might have wanted.  The Musha are legit, but underappreciated at best.  (I loooooooooved the Revolver(2), the predecessor to the Musha.)  We like the Precision somewhat, but it is essentially a lighter Rider, and so it is otherwise kind of a yawner.  The nice things about the Precision and Rider are that you know what you’re gonna get (except for last year when Mizuno shit the bed with the Rider 14), and Mizuno is arguably the most consistent brand on the wall.

Dendoshi is Mizuno’s effort to make us feel more a part of the Mizuno family, to include us in the conversation so we can in turn include the customer on the same conversation.  Admittedly, Mizuno got behind the curve, and was late to the game in introducing the lighter, lower, more flexible and, aw hell, more minimal shoes that we are all now familiar with.  Yeah, they had the Musha, which I think works really well in that category, and the Universe, which is so good in that respect that the Romanov cult digs it, but they are marketed as racers, and Mizuno wants to keep it that way.

(The new Ekiden, straight from the Japanese market, will intro in the US early 2013, and while basically a heavier—by 1 oz—Universe, it should also fit well in the The Shit category.  And my feeling is that Mizuno would do well to bring the Kudos to the US.  The Kudos is a racer, designed for the more efficient mid-foot runner and for Yukiko Akaba, an elite Japanese marathoner, and would bring new levels of badassery to Mizuno Running USA.  If these were in the U.S., I would bring them breakfast tacos and quad Americanos and then quietly back away so as not to disturb them(3).

We were told about or shown three (ok, four) new products that are due to arrive in the next year.  The EVO duo are an offering in the zero drop offset category.  Why are there two of them?  I don’t ****ing know.  You only need one zero drop.  But you can see the progressive design features that Mizuno is shooting for, and the less minimal of the two—I can’t get the names right because they aren’t particularly memorable names, or maybe that’s just some neurons misfiring, I don’t know—is the one you’ll want because it is more protective and won’t be such a stretch for you to wear and run it.  The colors are awesome.  Very Mizuno.  Which means bright color combinations that you wouldn’t expect, except from maybe artists who do lots of drugs.  Anyway, the EVO.  So that will be cool.

Then we saw the Wave Sayonara.  The name is almost too cute by half, but it has its lineage in the Wave Goodbye, a lightweight trainer/racer from about a dozen years ago.  The Sayonara will be lightweight trainer (roughly 8 oz for the men’s size 9) and continue with Mizuno’s affinity for quirky design and coloring.  The drawings we saw showed us shoes that don’t look very Mizuno at all.  So they got that going for them, which is nice.  Hode up!, you say.  So there will be the Rider, the Precision, the Sayonara, the Ronin?  That’s a lot of neutral, bro.  Yes it is.  Which is why Mizuno is ditching the Precision.  I know.  Seriously.  Just as the Precision achieves some real street cred, it gets yanked.  I know.  Me too.  But apparently the Precision has been on life support for some time now, and the plug was actually pulled right before the current one blew up, and by then it was too late.  The Sayonara was already in line and they were all, oopsie.  But I like that it will be considerably lighter, and (surprise! surprise!) has complete ground contact kinda like the Musha, because all those midfoot support trusses or whatever are completely unnecessary.  And when I say completely, I mean they are stupid.  So unless Mizuno just derps it, the Sayonara will get you much, much action.

You all know of our love for the New Balance flats these days right?  The 1400 makes you giddy, in the 1600 you begin to make questionable decisions, and the 5000—the lightest flat available—promotes full frontal nudity in public.  Well, Mizuno wouldn’t have any of it, so they had to tweak the Universe a bit so they could reclaim the mantle with the lightest flat out there.  It will weigh a reported 2.9 oz.  You will get pregnant just putting in on your feet.  I know.  The look of it was the result a deep dependence on hallucinogens or something; you will either like it and want to buy a pair, or you will become sterile instantly, purely out of revulsion.  So they’ve got the lightest flat on the wall.  Cool?  I don’t know.  I think I’d rather see an effort made to improve one of the core runner’s shoes, than to put more energy into making a shoe less purchase-able.

So there you go.  Three (or four, depending on your counting skills) new shoes from Mizuno.  Each of these has been at least a couple years in the making.  We know this because Mizuno went to great lengths to explain to us their process in taking a shoe to market.  They call it magokoro, which is a Japanese word that describes the honor one has for the trust of others—the customer.  This is what takes so long to deliver the right product.  It has to be just so.  It must be just enough, and no more.  I kinda like that.  No, I really like that.  From concept to the shoe wall, they are very, very deliberate in each step and this is why they are so slow to react to the market turns and trends.  Their belief is that they won’t compromise quality in design or in craftsmanship for producing the highest quality product that work best for the customer.

That is really impressive and should be applauded I think, but I also sense a bit of over-thought and some forest for the trees stuff going on here.  I mean, the best shoe of the last 5 years—our beloved Launch, RIP—had no technology in it.  Zee Row.  Want to talk about ride?  That shoe had ride.  Brilliant.  One of things that bounces around Mizuno HQ is the phrase, Show Me the Science.  I like that too.  But I think that if in pursuit of getting the numbers just so, juuuust right, you miss out on some really wonderful design opportunities and are putting more weight in that than in the actual run.

The time at Mizuno was well worth it.  I love storytelling and Mizuno really opened up some good conversation with some really exciting and intriguing stories.  Almost everyone I talked to who is with Mizuno was more than willing to talk about almost anything related to shoes and to Mizuno.  I like that.  I love that.   I hope that we can continue that conversation, that story.

1Stop it!  Naughty.
2Good album, too.
3No idea where that came from.  None.

Ramblings, for your feet.

by John Schrup

I saw on Faceplant the other day some pictures of Bill Rodgers running in the Adios 2.  So, yeah, go getcher self some.  Win some Boston Marathons and stuff.

Watching the gang on the sales floor fit shoes is fun.  I participate here and there, but mostly I just mess things up, so I try to be invisible when people are fitting.  But the presentation has changed and I find that interesting.  Back in the day, when explaining the differences and similarities among shoes, we would reference cushioning systems, stability features, flex grooves, yaaaaaaaawn, etc., etc.  That was then and this is right, so we’re teaching now about things that make more sense to the individual who will purchase and run in the shoe, as opposed just selling some brand’s product because they came up with a more memorable acronym or some shit.  Now we teach about offset and stack height, flexibility and more importantly, how to make your body stronger, healthier and more athletic, so that what you wear on your feet is tertiary in importance, at best.

But let’s not get bogged down on offset, stack height and all those cool new things.  The tendency is to think that these numbers have magical properties that will make us better, more efficient runners.  If you were to wear only 4mm drop shoes, then no doubt you’d be all kinds of Kenyan in no time, wouldn’t you?  Just because you’ve wisely dumped your Kayano doesn’t mean that all of a sudden you’re landing midfoot and eating ugali and sukuma wiki.  It doesn’t work like that, though we keep looking for the elusive magical bullet.  I don’t know why, we just do.

When we tell you that the best shoe for you is the least amount of shoe you are comfortable with, we’re telling you that you are better than you think you are, that you simply do not “need” all the things you think you do.  I mean, it’s just running, man.  All that shit ain’t gonna make you cooler, faster, more African-er.  All the variables of the shoe—offset, flexibility, weight, fit, firmness—combine to make the shoe what it is.  You will know, intuitively, which is the right one for you.  Give yourself some credit.  Yes, you will.  We’re A.) not going to bring out something that wouldn’t work for you, once we know what to look for and 2.) not going to make the decision for you, unless there is something so glaringly obvious that we wouldn’t be doing our job to let you out of the store with an unwise choice.

You will know it is right because you won’t feel a thing.  Or, more likely, it will be the shoe that is the least noticeable on your foot.  If the fit is right, if the weight is right, if the firmness is good, if the offset is right—all of that—your interpretation of the feel will be that it disappears on your foot.  The proprioceptive response will be nothing, sort of.  It’ll be the closest feeling to nothing that you can get, wearing a pair of running shoes, that is.

I don’t know where that all came from.

A couple of you have asked me why I’m all obsessed with Newton.  I wouldn’t call it obsessed, exactly, it is just that I’m really enjoying learning some new stuff.  I mean, that’s what it’s all about isn’t it?  There are times when the shoe reappears on my foot—going around corners faster than, say, easy—and I’ve been a little banged up lately, so admittedly there is some trepidation when I put them on, I don’t know why.  But they are much better than I’d ever have given them credit for.  The actuator lugs, as a technology, are much more valid than some crappy guide line flex groove or elastic arch band.  Anyway.  That’s that.

John Schrup is Rogue Running’s very own shoe guru, and has coached every age and every level of athlete in most every distance known to man … on planet earth! Including Team Rogue, currently. Don’t miss his Shoe Talk on Saturday, September 29, 9:45am at Rogue downtown (500 San Marcos St. 78702). Free and open to all!

Arrival, class, RUN.

by John Schrup

(check out Chapter 1 here and a recount by Amish James here)

THE ARRIVAL

When Amish James, Subtle Chuck and I arrived at the hotel in Boulder, it was getting a bit late in the day and we were pretty cooked.  I mean, that’s a long drive, especially when you’re in the Yaris.  The first thing we noticed was that we had been driven to the wrong hotel.  When we walked up to the place, some dude in a tux opened the door for us and then at the cash register place, where you check in, they called us Sir and werereally good with the, you know, grammar and stuff.  They gave us debit cards to open the doors to our rooms, which I’d never seen before.  Immediately I knew there must have been some mistake. We looked around the living room of the place.  At least I think it was the living room, because there were sofas and lamps and coffee tables everywhere.  There was much drinking of cocktails and wearing of plaid pants and laughing at jokes and all of the women in there had similarly smooth foreheads.  None of them were wearing Newton so I was pretty sure we were in the wrong hotel.

I told you that the rooms were pretty swank.  Totally.  Amish James and Subtle Chuck were hungry, so they talked about doing something about that, but I wanted to go for a run, so I found my room (I didn’t have to share a room with anyone, which, if you’ve never had a hotel room to yourself, is really awesome!) and after a few tries, figured out how to get the debit card to work in the door.  The room was noice!  The shower was this glass box, separate from the bathtub, which seemed like a really inefficient use of space, if you ask me.  The tub wasn’t even really a tub, but more like a small empty pool.  I’d never seen anything like that, so after making some imaginary snow angels in the tub I dug my running shorts out of the backpack and then got lost again in the hallways.

I ran up the hill on 9th, wearing the Distance for the very first time.  I’d worn them—lifestyled them, as they say in the biz—for a week or so beforehand to get used to them, but it turned out I didn’t really need to.  The feeling when running in them is entirely different than the feeling when, um, lifestyling in them.  Walking in them, at least initially was, well, just not comfortable.  I’m not going to lie.  No sir, didn’t like it.  Felt like I was walking with a deck of cards duct taped to the bottom of my shoe.  Maybe if you’d been wearing something more, I don’t know, Nimbusish, you’d have an easier transition, I don’t know.  But running in them was cake.  By the time I’d got to the end of the block, the deck of cards felt more like a really firm, really responsive forefoot.  I wish I could tell you differently.  They felt…springy?  I hate to use that term, but it’s true.

The climb up 9th took me through a neighborhood that was a combination of college kids, parked on front porches, drinking beer and getting high, and older women, who’d lived since forever in their little stone bungalow, bent at the waist, pulling weeds and such, growing a mean garden.  Flowers everywhere.  I love the energy of college towns.  I’d forgot how it felt to run at altitude, and at the intersection of 9th and some street with a stop sign and a coffee shop or a head shop I recognized that my breathing was a bit heavier than I am used to.  There was a little sting in my lungs.  I’d really missed that feeling.  9th climbs for a while and I was becoming very aware that I’d been climbing for a while.   I was so excited about the feel of the shoes, the smell of the clean air, the energy of the town that I thought I’d best turn around and head back to the hotel.  I’d been running for some time and when I looked down at my watch and it said, like, eight minutes, I suddenly felt like I weighed about 700 pounds.   But a few minutes later, the road hit a dead end and I turned left and got to descend back toward the center of town.  The neighborhood there was alternately nice and sketch.  There would be some swankity swank house that looked like Fallingwater and then some college kid’s house that looked like Fallingdown.  And then I noticed something else:  I hadn’t been thinking about my shoes!  I hadn’t been thinking about my shoes!  SFW you say.  SFW.  That’s exactly the way it is supposed to be!  You’re not supposed to notice the shoes.  What have we been saying all this time?  The shoe is supposed to disappear.

And so here’s something else cool, besides that this chapter is about to end:  Because I’m a total dork and a card carrying member of the OCD Running Club, I Google mapped my run after I’d returned to my room, after having been lost in the hallways for a third time in an hour.  When I compared my run time to the distance on the map, something wasn’t right.  I’d run farther, faster, and with less effort than I had in a while.  By my completely non-scientific calculations, the cooler, drier air cancelled out the altitude and the up hills cancelled out the down hills, and there was mostly flat anyway, when I ran along the creek.  But I’d made good time, which is rare these days, for me anyway.  I was running paces that I haven’t run in a while—at sea level, or whatever it is here in Austin.  Not that I look, but I know, because I know.  Whatever that means.

Was it the shoes?  Hold please…

——————

THE CLASSROOM

In the morning, I was a little foggy, which I’ll attribute to the lack of oxygen and not to the sleeping arrangement, so my first thought was getting some caffeine into my bloodstream as quickly as possible.  Of course, the small amount of coffee in the hotel room kitchen provided only enough stimulation to allow me to figure out that I’d put both legs through one leg of my shorts and then how to fix that situation.  By the time I’d reached the Newton HQ a few blocks away I was aware enough of my surroundings to work the front door properly and identify myself appropriately when asked.

And this is the part that began to change my view.  I fully expected a full frontal bludgeoning of my cerebral cortex with the upwithpeople colored footwear.  The classroom setting was a little, I don’t know, clinical, and perhaps I’d have preferred that we all lie around on pillows and pass the carafe of espresso, but what are you gonna do?  I gotta be up front here, I was expecting to sit myself in a room with a bunch of peacocky triathletes who introduce themselves with name, resting heart rate and time trial frame weight in grams and who have energy levels just this side of meth, so I was a bit intimidated.  And while there was a little of that in there, everyone was super friendly and open, except for this one dude, who couldn’t even look at me, which I totally understand from a GI distress viewpoint, but still.  It did take some time to get everyone participating in the discussions—altitude?  Hangovers?  West Nile?—but the discussion topics were exactly what I was looking for, if anyone was asking.

The Newton people are my kind of people.  They dig their shoes, yeah, but they are more into educating us all on the general running subject, in which shoes are often included, but still are not the only part.  When we say, All you need to run is a good pair of shoes, that doesn’t mean that IS the conversation, because nothing—almost nothing, anyway—is further from the truth.  The shoe is just one piece of the discussion—just one little bit—and Newton was the first presenter to acknowledge that, at least in my memory.  Which, all things being equal, sucks ass.  I can’t remember exactly the chronology of the discussions, but thankfully I have the schedule that was handed to us, but it went a little something like this:

Ok, first:  The last 10 minutes or so of each hour we got to walk around outside and stretch and generally not be in the classroom.  Awesome.  It kept me from going all ADD on everyone in there and drawing on the table tops or clipping my toenails or some shit.  Though I did text some pictures to a friend, who enjoys a discussion about tasty beverages in the same way I enjoy a discussion about all this shit.  I got to do some lunges on the street corner, which you won’t often find in a seminar program thing.

We started with biomechanics, and then ambled through aerobic development, form drills, strength and range of motion, the philosophy of running shoes, the history of running shoes, a little on nutrition—all the stuff I like to talk about that isn’t offensive to the general public.  These are the conversations that come before we—this is the collective we—ought to be talking about shoes, or GPS or any of that shit.  It goes like this:  General health (nutrition included)–>fitness–>running–>shoes.  But most often people start with shoes and work backward.  Newton gets this and presented things, more or less, in this fashion.   Ok, so they ended with shoes, which is the way it should be.  And on a few occasions, we’d go across the street to the high school track or to the park by the creek, next to the library, and apply what we’d learned the discussions.  And honestly, none of the information was new, but it was refreshing to talk about it, rather than just spend the whole time talking propaganda or new products lines or whatever.

So my fear of all the classroom stuff was unfounded.  And whatever proselytizing they were doing was working, because it was so passively offered.  There was no hard sell.  And that’s the good stuff.  They were only evangelical about running, at least that first day, and that made the trip for me.

————————-

THE GROUP RUN

So, um, where was I?  Oh, yes.  That first day at the Newton thing in Boulder was mostly just all of us—Amish James, Subtle Chuck and I—getting situated, getting the lay of the land, grabbing some din din.

And we spent the following day in class, talking real talk, going for walks, doing some drills, doing some stretches.  You know, stuff.  After it was over, it didn’t feel like we’d been in class all day, because really, we hadn’t.  So that was nice.  And the content of the stuff we learned in the class was, in my mind, much less important to me than that they presented the stuff itself.  I left the classroom with an greater appreciation for what they are doing.

The next order of business wasn’t business at all.  Everyone agreed to meet outside the Taj Majal for a short group run before we all met for dinner.  The group run was a kick to the ego, at least at first.  Ian was there to lead, and then there were maybe a dozen others not including Amish J and myself.   It was less a group run as it was a group time trial, at least from my perspective.  Ian, who holds the world record for kayaking all the Fourteeners or some shit, jogged along at what for him is an easy effort, but which was not the case for the rest of the group, if we were to judge by the single fileness of echelon.  We were going up the creek trail—Boulder’s version of the Town Lake trail—past high school kids doing art projects, hippies performing their afternoon ablutions, tourists taking pictures of various nature things, and lots of impossibly tan people.  After about ¾ of a mile, Amish suggested that the group split up.  I think he sensed that it might get ugly if we continued on like this.  About half of the group was over-enthusiastically in agreement, and we went to the right, under a bridge, and Ian’s group went to the left, climbing up the mountain, into the scary, dark wilderness.  They weren’t carrying long bows or Chinese throwing stars or anything, but no one seemed too afraid since Ian brought his bare hands and compression socks.

Of course, out of pure scientific dedication, I was wearing the Distance.  That, and it was the only running shoe I brought.  I had also brought some green flip flops that my cousin bought for me when he and some friends flew to Rio de Janeiro one day because they were bored and drunk.  Of course, it being an entirely scientific endeavor, and because I’m a total dork, I thought about the shoes, and why I should or should not like them.  It is difficult for me to do two things at once—I didn’t receive the multitasking chromosome apparently—and so as we snaked along the trail, I did my best not to hip check trees or roll my ankle on the roots and rocks underfoot, since I was also thinking at the time.

The lugs under the forefoot—the Actuator Lugs—are described by Newton as an “active” technology, in contradistinction to the “passive” technologies in all the other shoes, except for those Spira shoes, which have actual, real life metal springs in them, or those Z-Coil things that people wear to save their backs or whatever.  Anyway, I don’t notice the spring effect as much as I notice the firmness of the forefoot.  It’s really, really firm.  Like, adidas firm, except with more firmness.  Most people, if we are to look at sales of things like the Nimbus or the Ghost, want plush, marshmallowy bloopness in their shoes.  Yeah, that feels good, but it isn’t necessarily what is best for the body.  There was several years ago a study done with gymnasts and different softnesses and densities of floor mats and it was found that the more cushioned the floor mat, the higher the injury rate.  So, take that as you want.

The firm forefoot of the Newton makes them more responsive, which is perhaps one of the reasons that people say they feel faster in them.  And, I think, another reason that people’s initial response is that the forefoot feels a little awkward.  Mostly, I think, we just aren’t used to firmer shoes any longer and anything that doesn’t feel like warm bubblegum under the feet is strange.  That, and because the very low offset is combined with the firm midsole, the sensation is, while standing, almost as if you are back on your heels, so the first word is often, “Whoa!”  But running is entirely different.  Whether you land midfoot or on the heel, the toe off is just faster, or at least feels that way.  I haven’t done a frame by frame analysis, but I think Ian did at some point, so I don’t know. (And, as dorky as this is gonna sound, earlier this week, back in the Brentcrest neighborhood, I did my standard evening loop, without looking at the watch, in my Distance.  It was about 100, I felt like I was almost jogging, and I ran about 90 seconds faster than I usually do.  It could have been that I snorted a bunch of chia seeds beforehand, I don’t know.)

I wanted to go a little further than everyone else, who seemed eager to get back to the hotel and, you know, luxuriate, so I wandered a bit up the hill into a cool old neighborhood with boulevards and great trees and kids playing in the front yards.  Up ahead there were a group of women jogging on the sidewalk, in the same direction I was going.  I thought it was really strange that they were all in full sweatsuits while it was about 90 degrees.  I mean, it is a dry heat, but still.  And then I remembered back to my Albuquerque days.  It’s the Japanese.

I was going really easy, even for me, because the oxygen was, you know, lacking and all, and I was catching them.  I only mention this to remind you people that you have to put yourself in the gutter in order to get some benefit.   If I’m running really easy, even for me, and I pass women who make a living doing this, then some of you could stand to STFD.

So anyway, I fully expected to have some complaints at this point.  But I couldn’t come up with any, except my initial prejudices about the whole triathlon thing, and it was, overall, a really nice run.  The shoes disappearing on my feet, and I couldn’t argue against that.  I was thinking to myself how I would tell Tim and Ryan and Ian back at Newton that I liked the shoes, while still trying to be all cool and not like a sycophant.  The run back was mostly downhill, so there might have been a 2:00 400 in there somewhere, and about a mile out from the hotel, Ian’s group rolls up behind me.   I latched on and stood up tall and swung my arms a bit faster.  Within two minutes I could feel my lungs pressing on the back of my teeth.   (The last time I had this feeling was back in Albuquerque coaching some high school kids and I was trying to hold on for dear life to our number one girl at the end of a ten mile progression run.  I ran about 70 flat, and she dropped me with about 2K to go and finished easily a minute ahead of me).

Anyway, right before I got dropped by the Ian train, one of the younger guys with him said, barely out of breath, “We saw a bear.”

Runner Review: Accelerade

By Elda Hernandez

I am the kind of person who has tried all kinds of products in the past trying to figure out what really works for me. The reality is that being consistent is the only way to achieve results that are advertised. I figured I should be consistent and try it out before I judged this product! I did my testing when I worked out for at least an hour. This included two of my long runs, and multiple hour+ workouts. Running and bootcamp were my workouts and at least 7 different times I tracked the effect of the product – this was fun and new to me!

Ok, so about the drink. Calories are only 120 per serving…not bad! It is a little rich in the sugar department: 20g per serving - yikes! I guess I will be watching my sugar intake the days that I plan on using it. Sodium is alright and actually good for hydration: 210mg. One thing that I thought was funny is that the label says “The Protein Powered Sports Drink,” while it only has 5g of protein per serving. I am not sure what to compare it to, so to me it is just more information. There are a lot of products out there that have more protein in them, but I am pretty sure that this product does what it advertises; it made me feel better!

Ok, now back to the product…

Taste: this flavor (Mountain Berry) is pretty good. It is a little tart and a bit chalky, but pretty tasty. The consistency is a bit thicker than I expected, but it does not have a negative effect. MAKE SURE YOU REALLY MIX WELL. It is important because you will get the chalky bland taste then a POW of sweet at the bottom if you don’t keep shaking it and making sure it is mixed well.

Oh and one more thing, drink it COLD. Warm is not a good taste for this product – TRUST ME.

Feeling (pre-run consumption): I felt a tad bit more energetic. I was more focused and felt hydrated – more so than I usually do during our workouts in this insane heat. I did my time trial and had the Accelerade about 30 minutes before – I think it was a good choice! I survived and did pretty darn good for a new runner – 10 minutes for the mile!!

Feeling (post-run consumption): I really like the way I feel with the Accelerade after workouts. My muscles are not as cramped and I feel a new wave of energy; no, no – this does not mean I want to go running again – just a good feeling. I felt a more calm rest instead of the restless legs with the cramping and heaviness that comes after long runs.

I shared it with my running buddies after 2 runs and they all approved of the taste. A couple of them actually really liked it and the other 2 were just OK with it. My good friend MK said it seemed to help since she didn’t feel the typical aches and pains the day after our long runs. Sweet!

Feeling (during-run consumption): Well here is where things changed. I cannot drink this stuff while running for the ONE reason that it doesn’t go down while warm. Blah. To be fair, my water bottles are little runner ones that attach to the waist belt – I guess I could get an insulated container to run with instead. I am just not one to drink a whole lot while on a run.

I gave it a good shot and really think it is a great product. I really like the way it made me feel after runs and would definitely buy it as a recovery aid.  Thank you Rogue for letting me test this before having to buy it!

Mental toughness

Image

by coach Amy Anderson

Maybe you’ve heard the quote, “Running is 90 percent mental, and the rest is all in your head”.  The best athletes don’t only train hard physically, they also work on the psychological aspects of their sport. Here is Part 3 in a series of traits and characteristics of successful marathoners.

MENTAL TOUGHNESS.  Mental toughness won’t guarantee your success any more than confidence or composure will.  But it does create an environment that fosters your success.  What is mental toughness?  Here are a few things to think about:

1.     Having long term goals takes mental toughness.  When did you decide to run a fall marathon?  Last year?  You started this program in the spring?  Realigning the priorities of your life, getting out the door, and training seriously for 5-6 months takes mental toughness.  This process didn’t happen overnight and some people would (and did) throw in the towel.

2.     Failure takes mental toughness.  When you take a workout to “failure” (can’t get up that hill or can’t run the last repeat at the same pace), you send clear signals to your body that it needs to grow stronger. Your body responds. The same thing happens in your head.  Which is why some of the workouts we do are really hard.  Maybe momentarily impossibly hard?  Think, The Run From Hell.  Or, 2k repeats in 100 degree heat. Perhaps even your LAB.  Remember that a workout done to “failure” wasn’t a failure in the traditional sense of the word.   Rather, it sent a signal to both your body and your mind to grow stronger and get tougher. Make a list of workouts you’ve done this summer and reflect on them as you work on your mental game.

3.     Being adaptable takes mental toughness (whoops! I failed that one last Thursday).  Adaptability lets you deal effectively with unexpected situations before and during your race.  Anticipate and prepare for how you’ll handle a last minute change to the course, a delayed start, the shoe lace that comes untied, dropping your electrolytes, chafing.  What about nasty weather? (Hello Boston 2012!) Approach your race having already thought through “if this happens, then I will…”  That way you can see those situations not as excuses to fail but as opportunities for your mental toughness to prevail.

4.     Not letting your head quit before your body does takes mental toughness.  The late miles of the marathon are hard.  I don’t have to tell you that. It’s easy to talk yourself out of a pace or effort level that your body is tired of.  “Ask yourself, ‘Can I give more?’ The answer is usually ‘Yes’.” So said Paul Tergat, a professional marathoner from Kenya.  And he was right.  Remind yourself that you’re tougher than you think you are.

So.  Are you mentally tough? What can Rogue do to help?

Amy coaches marathoners at Rogue Downtown. You can join her this fall in preparation for the 2013 Austin Marathon.

Runner Review: 110% Ice + Compression

by Scott Towle

I’d seen these big shiny packages at expos and in stores, so I wondered what all the hoopla was about. Ice + compression makes a lot of sense for recovery.  I already regularly use compression sleeves, so adding ice to the mix seemed like a good idea.  As an ultra runner and a long course tri dork, I can use all the recovery I can get.

When I first opened the metallic package, I laughed a bit.  I wasn’t sure what to expect, but as large as the packing was, I thought there would be a lot more inside.  The two calf sleeves were folded over four flat plastic sheets and two post card-sized print pieces.  Eventually, I figured out that the packaging makes for an insulated carrier for the ice sheets.  I never got a chance to test how long the sheets would stay frozen in the insulated package, but I have to imagine that during the summer in Texas, you aren’t looking at a long time.  However, I imagine it would keep them cold in cooler weather while you raced.

The first thing I noticed with these calf sleeves is that they fit much tighter than the calf sleeves I’ve been using.  After putting on the sleeves, I followed the instructions for the ice sheets.  I simply had to soak the sheets in warm water until they expanded and then throw them in the freezer.  Once the sheets were frozen, I just needed to slide them into the sleeves.  It took a little work to get the sheets into the sleeves, but it wasn’t overly difficult.  From there, I let them do their magic.

Did they work?  Well, I didn’t have any calf soreness during the two-plus week trial period.  I used the sleeves after both short and long workouts.  I threw them on after a particularly hard 4.5 hour ride on a Saturday and turned around and won my age group in a triathlon on Sunday.  I put them back on after the tri and then knocked out an eleven mile run that evening.  My quads were pretty dead, but my calves felt fairly normal. Last weekend I threw the sleeves on after a tough 30K trail race and had no calf soreness the following day. I can’t say that I would swear these sleeves were a “cure all,” but I definitely can’t prove they don’t work.  Even if it’s just placebo, I’ll take it and continue using them.

Pros: No soreness.  “Cool” factor (terrible pun very much intended).
Cons: Price.  Difficult to put on, even harder to take off.

In the end, I think the price will probably scare me away from trying any of the other 110% products, but if you have extra money laying around, and want to have the latest and greatest, the 110% compression is worth checking out.  I’d love to give the shorts a try and see if they would make a difference in the “dead quads” I get from a tough ride or a running race with a lot of downhill.  Outfitting yourself with the complete arsenal of 110% compression wouldn’t be cheap, but if you don’t like ice baths, this product might be a good alternative, especially with the added benefit of compression.

 

Want to try a pair for yourself? Rogue Running has them!

Road Trip!

by John Schrup

Amish James, Subtle Chuck and I are now just a few days from blastoff to Newtonvilleboro.  I cleaned out the Yaris this morning, got all the empty coffee cups out of the backseat.  Gonna leave at least one pr of non-Newton shoes in the hatchback in case it, you know, doesn’t work out.  But we’re gonna need the room, since Amish James says he’s bringing two or three bags, because you never know what the weather will be like, or some shit like that.  Which is a little strange coming from a guy named Amish.  Chuck insists on bringing his bootleg tape collection, even though the Yaris doesn’t have a tape player anymore.  But since he’s still all PTSD over Jerry’s death, we’ll give him that.

I packed lots of healthy things to eat along the way.  Bringing your own food saves money and we won’t feel all bloated and gassy from the DQ’s and other obligatory road food stops, and in a small cockpit like the Yaris, with these temperatures, that pretty much guarantees .  Got a couple pounds of macadamia nuts (the candy of the nut world), fat sack of apples, two jars of peanut butter, 23 coconut waters (drank one), one pound of chia seeds, half pound of bison jerky, 2.5 gallons of water (spring),  two pints each of blueberries, strawberries, raspberries, blackberries.  Berry season is pretty much over, so they’re not looking too good already.  Might have to break out the Ronco Food Dehydrator for the trip.  Twizzlers.

Yesterday I met with one of the Bitchwolves over lunch to talk about training, West Nile virus, liver function and, you know, stuff.  We sat outside at a picnic table and luxuriated over our burgers and fries.  I explained the trip to Boulder and the wear testing of the shoes and shit.  I tried to explain my reluctance to buy into the whole lugged sole and all.  Her level of interest pretty much stopped at a free pair for her, and then she changed the subject to something that I can’t remember.

When I returned to the shop, absurdly hopped up on caffeine, which should be a surprise to no one, we on the north side talked some about the shoes.

“It looks like you’re wearing cycling cleats,” said Ruth.  “Can you get some for Bala?”  Bala is the dog.

“They look too loose,” said Carolyn.  “You got the extra fabric there.”  I explained that the Newton people said it isn’t necessary, or even desirable, to lace your shoes up snug to the foot.

“You didn’t bathe again today, did you?” said Allison.  Allison ran the marathon in the Olympic Trials so she is allowed to ask those kinds of questions.

“What are you going to say about them?”
“Do you like them?”
“Now, why are you doing this?”

My explanations were met mostly with blank stares, which soon turned to watering eyes, and my bathing habits for the week had been exposed.

All of their questions were good ones, and it reminds me that the whole process of choosing the right shoe for you is not so black and white.  It’s a bunch of shades of gray.  I don’t know how many, but a bunch.  This is another almost blasphemous thing to say, but in the end, I think that of all the variables that go into running, running healthy, running faster or longer or whatever, your running shoes should be the least of your concerns.  What I mean to say is that once you buy your running shoes, they should disappear to the point that you don’t have to think about them again until it is time to unlace them after your run.  Yeah, the fitting process requires some thought, and you won’t likely do well to throw darts when choosing, but ultimately, you gotta go with the one that will be the least obtrusive to your running or training.  Maybe you make a choice and then a couple months later decide that there might be something better.  There might be.  But in the global picture, you’re better off choosing a shoe based not on which one will do more for you, but which one will allow you to do more.

This will likely be my last transmission until we arrive in Boulder.  There are still a ton of preparations and I’m a little behind schedule.  The shaman who usually blesses the Yaris before lengthy road trips hasn’t come back from Vegas, where he’s been for the last week at the annual American Shaman Convention and Potluck, and I’m getting a little concerned.  We might just have to cancel if he doesn’t show.  Maybe I can find one quick on Craigslist.