New Balance 1210: Ultra awesome!

tumblr_inline_mkqsh1WlPf1qz4rgp

by Erik Stanley

The New Balance 1210 (aka Leadville) busted in this year as an ultra trail shoe ready to toe the dirt line next to the Brooks Cascadia. With a smooth transition, 8mm offset, and 10.4 oz on the Rogue scale  (size 9), I really like this shoe.

The 1210 was designed for ultra running, and named after the Leadville 100 mile trail race. It was created by NB after testing and measuring how runners’ feet respond to Leadville itself. New Balance increased the volume of the upper to allow for foot swelling over longer distances. It also offers a slightly denser foam on the inner heel to provide some stability for tired feet, while the tongue is fairly protective and keeps the laces from adding pressure to the top of your foot.

Over the past few weeks I have spent a lot of time in this shoe as I rebuild my mileage. I logged 75 miles last week, with most of my runs on the Barton Creek Greenbelt and Bull Creek here in Austin,TX.

One run that stands out is my new Wednesday adventure run from the 360 access, The Hump-day Hump Run. This is a run open to the world! We meet at Taco Deli (Spyglass) and run 75 minutes (give or take a few miles) at 7:15 am on the Greenbelt. There are no trail markers or restrictions to where we go: we run, we talk, we eat tacos.

tumblr_inline_mkqx201wZ81qz4rgpThis past Wednesday we headed through the “Sweet 16″ where the trail crosses the creek 16 times within a few miles. This was the morning after more than 2″ of rain, so we were having fun! The shoe has a ton of room, and some would say it feels too wide. Being the “Leadville” I would say there is adequate space for 100 miles of foot-swelling mountain running. The shoe did drain really well, even with the multiple creek crossings.

As a lighter “ultra shoe”, I still don’t consider this a minimal running shoe. 8 mm offset is less than the Cascadia for sure, but she still has some girth. The Vibram tread is pretty grippy, as I found on some of the steeper sections, and I didn’t have to be overly cautious. Even on the wet limestone it stuck better than other trail shoes! The tread on the heel is reversed to keep you from slipping while braking on the downhills.There is some rock protection, but I still feel sharper rocks poke through a bit. For the most part, this provides enough protection for me.

I did pick up quite a bit of mud, as the trail was a fresh, soggy mix of mud and clay. No shoe could have kept the mud from sticking! I had to stop and tie my shoe a few times; it’ll take some knot experimentation to find out what works best to keep these laces tied.

I’d been dealing with pain and mild swelling on the top of my right foot since Cactus Rose, and the tongue on the 1210 does a solid job keeping off the pressure on that area. It’s not a fluffy pillow, but more like a Tempur-pedic pad that evenly distributes any pressure.

tumblr_inline_ml5mlayau61qz4rgpWe hit Travis Country and ran the road for a mile or so, which was fine – I didn’t slip or have any problems on the asphalt. We ended up hitting a few creek crossings on the way back from Rattle Snake, and I had one more shoelace tie to take care of before finishing at Taco Deli.

All in all, the 1210 is a great shoe that everyone should consider as their next trail purchase!

(Next week. You be there. Hump Day Hump Run from Taco Deli. 75min at 7:15am. Come explore!)

———————–

tumblr_inline_mkqxwfClDN1qz4rgpErik Stanley coaches The Off Rogues, a Rogue Running trail training group that is currently preparing for the Rogue Trail Series 30K!

Best New Shoes of 2013

by Chris McClung

wave riderMizuno Wave Rider 16 – Best Update

Mizuno’s Wave Rider has been a favorite of runners since its first version. The shoe has a firm but smooth ride with a forgiving upper that keeps your foot in place while still fitting a wide variety of feet.  Version 15 of the shoe was its best iteration yet, until Mizuno topped itself with this latest iteration. Version 16 has the same midsole and outsole that everyone loves (from Version 15), but the shoe now has an all-new upper that weighs a full ounce lighter than the previous version. The shoe dipped under 10 ounces, which puts it on par with many lightweight shoes that have much less cushioning. By using new materials and making small changes such as reducing the size of the logo on the in-step, Mizuno dropped the weight of the shoe without compromising the cushioning or feel of the shoe under foot. And, if you can cut a full ounce from each step without changing anything else, why wouldn’t you?!?

 

launchBrooks Launch – Best Return from the Dead

The Launch has been the best-kept secret in specialty running since its introduction three years ago. It was so good, in fact, that Brooks made only color changes to the original design until they famously announced that it was being dropped from its line, with plans to end production in December of 2012. With the announcement, message boards and blogs exploded in uproar as many Launch lovers (read: fanatics) screamed for its return. Brooks finally heard their cries, announcing in December that the Launch would return with throwback colors this month.

The shoe is elegant in its simplicity. Its midsole is void of many of the “technologies” that mark the signature designs of other more-marketed shoes, but the simplicity is what makes it great. It is lightweight at only 9.1 ounces, but with a cushioned feel that can support any type of runner. And, the ride is so smooth that your heel to toe transition in this shoe makes your stride nearly effortless at any pace. Long live the Launch!

 

boostAdidas Energy Boost – Best New Innovation

 

The Boost just debuted in February and, with it, Adidas is getting more attention in the running shoe category than it has in a decade. The signature component of this shoe is a newly designed midsole material that, according to lab tests from independent sources, has the most energy return of any midsole material ever placed in a shoe. The material is also reported to be highly durable and resistant to the effects of temperature that can wreak havoc on traditional foams, making it a great pick to combat the Texas heat. Putting it on, the shoe has a plush step-in feel, and when running, it can only be described as abnormally bouncy. The bounce feels strange at first but, after the initial shock-value fades, makes you feel like you can run forever in it. The upper is snug, flexible and fits a wider variety of feet than most other Adidas models with a more-narrow fit. Also, look out for two additional versions of the shoe coming later this year, the AdiStar Boost and Adios Boost, debuting in August and October, respectively.

 

1400New Balance 1400 – Best New Twist

The New Balance 1400, like the Brooks Launch, is known for its elegant simplicity, with a pure-foam midsole and no added bells and whistles. The shoe debuted last year to rave reviews. At 7.1 ounces, it is considered a “marathon racing shoe,” but the level of cushioning in the shoe feels more like 9-10 ounces, thanks to its innovative RevLite foam from New Balance that weighs 33% less than traditional foams. The high cushioning-to-weight ratio makes it extremely versatile to be used as a training shoe by some or as a racing flat by others. In June, New Balance will release a version of this shoe with a new competition-style upper that is also used in their super-light track spikes. This twist will drop another ounce from the shoe with no change to how the shoe feels under foot, permanently re-defining what it means to have lightweight cushioning. This, my friends, is not your father’s New Balance.

sayonaraMizuno Wave Sayonara – Most Anticipated Debut

In July, Mizuno is dropping the popular Wave Precision from its line, the original lightweight trainer, and replacing it with the all-new Wave Sayonara. Though the decision seems like a big gamble, it is a calculated risk forced in part by the changes to the Wave Rider mentioned above. With the Wave Rider now at 9.9 ounces, the Wave Precision was too similar at 9.5 ounces, so Mizuno is giving it an overhaul with a new name in the Sayonara. At Rogue, we can’t wait. Though we have not been able to try it yet, the Sayonara is reported to be over an ounce lighter than the Precision, with a more responsive ride and faster feel, all while maintaining similar levels of cushioning. If the fit is as good as the current Precision, which has the best-fitting upper on the wall, then these changes could be a recipe for our new favorite shoe. Hello to the Sayonara, good-bye to your running group friends after you lace on these new shoes this summer!

 See the published version of this article on page 12 of Naturally Fit Magazine!

Rogue’s take on the ASICS Gel-Lyte33 2

By Coach Warren Brown: 

Image

At Rogue we’ve been scratching our heads for the last few years as ASICS has gotten stale.  A couple years ago they released a brilliant shoe to the US called the Tarther ImageThe shoe offered a forgiving toe box for those with slightly wider feet, this feature also provided a clever means of reducing the impact of the runner’s landing without adding excessive materials between your foot and the ground.  The shoe was light, responsive, smooth and now discontinued in the US because it didn’t have the marketing dollars to get it into enough stores nationwide.  Can we start a Twitter campaign? #bringbackthetarther –set go!

The more foam, gel, air…. technology (this usually isn’t a good thing), the more you lose your feel for the ground.  Contrary to what the design team behind some of the mega clunky shoes produced in the past couple decades want you to believe- more is not better, heck…it’s not even good.

Like Brooks with the Pure Project, ASICS just over a year ago released a lightweight “natural running” line with the 33 series.  We appreciated the effort, but the just missed the mark in terms of blowing us away like we hoped.  The Gel-Lyte33 came SO, SO close to hitting the mark, but its agitating overlay at the bottom of the laces irritated the top of nearly everyone we were fitting worse than a chiggers in the summer….well, that’s a big of an exaggeration.  Shoe durability is always a tricky thing to score because it usually improves at the cost of added weight and price.  At $100 though, the Gel-Lyte33 just broke down awfully quick for the price and weight.

Enter > ASICS Gel-Lyte33 2

Image

**SPOILER ALERT**  ASICS just threw in a legitimate contender for our top five shoe award with this update.  If this were Hollywood, Roger Ebert would question its early season release for fading in the mind of the Academy during Oscar voting.   Fortunately for us, this ain’t Hollywood and Rogues don’t forget.  Basically every frustrating aspect of the first iteration has been addressed.  While it is admittedly heavier than its predecessor, it’s a forgivable transgression as it’s largely due to the addition of a true outsole (as opposed to the EVA being nearly completely exposed), which enhances not only durability, but also traction underfoot.  The upper has been addressed as well with the correction of that previously mentioned issue with the overlay and also a more secure fit around the heel.  The improved upper also seems to accommodate those of us with wider feet better than ever.  The shoe maintains its 6mm drop that has shown itself to be an easier adjustment for those who aren’t able to run in the Saucony Progrid Kinvara 3s (4mm), but are ready to get out of the traditional 10-12mm trainers.

ASICS is starting to tout a new technology in several new models known as Fluid Axis.  Fluid Axis is designed to help compliment the motion of the runner’s subtalar joint (what dictates a runner’s degree of pronation).  ASICS states that until now, shoes focused on the up and down motion of the ankle joint.  After 50 miles in my Lytes, I haven’t noticed the effects of this technology, but I’m neutral and not a heel striker, so a technology in the heel obviously won’t have as much influence on the ride of shoe on my foot. 

The shoe strays away from an extensive trussic system giving it a relatively smooth transition.  I wouldn’t call it Brooks Launch level, but it’s still pretty good.  The ride is responsive enough for tempo runs and intervals, but not so much so that it takes away from using it for an easy jog down Shoal Creek. 

Other noteworthy features to be found with the second iteration of the Lyte include ASICS sticking to their guns by avoiding a super-firm heel counter. Kudos for the design team for not being afraid to move forward with this while many other shoes out there today continue to overemphasize that piece of the shoe.

Image

 

Warren Brown is 2:25 marathoner. He coaches the coolest kids in all of Texas – Team Rogue Prep. He manages Rogue Running in Cedar Park. He Blogs. He puts on summer running camps & has huge quads! Come hang out with him

The Best Running Shoes of 2012

by John Schrup

These are the running shoes in 2012 that are worthy of the Rogue Wall.  Yeah, we have our opinions.  For example:  We are of the opinion that the sun rises in the east.  So, there.  We are also of the opinion that your running shoes should be the least of your worries.  The right shoe for you is the least amount of shoe you are comfortable wearing – the one that disappears the second you put it on.

Our Top Five Six

adidas Adios 2

This is the shoe that was the reason for creating these awards.  Actually, the original Adios got this award—the yellow with black one that we first saw on Haile’s feet, or red or green that came after, whichever.  When you wore that shoe, everything was right with the world.  If you were to visit the Middle East, the ambient music would be “It’s a Small World.”  Republicans and Democrats would argue only over which one loves the other the most, sorta like googly-eyed high school kids with their first, you know.   You’d PR in everything—everything!   10K.  Breakfast.  Home Depot.  Lunges.  Socks.  Whatever.  Adidas are making a big push to regain some of their lost glory—and they’re doing a pretty good job of it—and their shoes will come around even more when they drop that maha-sucky Formotion piece.  It is no coincidence that the best adidas running shoes don’t have the Formotion shit on them.  The Adios is easily—easily!—adidas’ best shoe, and it is also easily—easily!—one of the best shoes you can buy.  The responsiveness is the first thing you notice.  One guy in the group who used to be in lurve with the Vomero has been seen in the A2, and was heard saying something along the lines of  “**** these things feel fast!”  (Alliteration!) When I’m running through the Brentview in my Adios, all the cats and dogs in the neighborhood stop what they’re doing and bring their favorite squeaky toys out to the curb as offerings.  Old school street cred.

Saucony Kinvara 3

You know how we love this shoe.  Yeah, we’d firm ‘em up a smidge, but other than that, the Kinvara are the shit. And now that we’re on that subject, if the K3 felt more like the Mirage (or Adios) in firmnessicity it would pretty much be all I would wear.   You could argue that this is the shoe that brought lower offsets to the mainstream.  I’m not going to use the M word, because, like, that’s not the kind of people we are, but that too.  Uber-light, protective, moderately flexible, the K3 is for training, for racing, for long walks on the beach—doesn’t matter. I’ve noticed that when I wear the Kinvara and then afterward go to the Central Market for the, you know, groceries, I’m much more likely to have someone ask me where I got my hair done.  They’re that good.  If the Kinvara were running for office and they had a debate, the Kinvara would wait until its opponent stopped talking, lean in to the mic and say, “Awesome.”  And the election would be over.   Also, the A5 should be renamed the Kinvara Racer.

New Balance 1600 

Just, wow.  New Balance is like one of those sports teams that you watch in your favorite professional league that sits at the bottom of their conference for so long that people are like, We have a professional sports team?  Really?  Hm.  And so then the owner gets tired of having to pick hair out of his dinner at fancy restaurants because the chef hates him so much, so he goes out and buys a whole new team.  I don’t know about the first thing, but NB definitely bought a new team.  New designers, new marketers, all that shit.  And now they are making some of the very best stuff available.  We’re big fans of their decision to reduce offsets from 12 to 8, because it is the right thing to do.  They’ve got a boss lineup of the 890, the 1400 and the 1600.  There might not be a better trio on the wall.  We like the 1600 the best because we like things that are awesome, despite our obvious efforts to prove otherwise.  You can train in it, race in it, whatever.  The fit is mmmmmmm, sexy snug.  Mama like!  It is almost exactly what a running shoe should be, and nothing more.  The only thing I’d change is the EVA;  I’d make the midsole firmer, but I ain’t complainin’.  You wear this shoe and you could be a half ton, smoke seven packs of Camel unfiltered a day, wear P. Terry’s Cologne and produce enough personal natural gas that Russian oil companies would be all up in your shizz wanting to frack you and you’d still be moving like a bat out of Hades.  The 1400 probably has a broader appeal, but the 1600 is definitely one of the 2012 shoes.  I would blindfold these bad girls and feed them truffles, like in that movie with those people in that language.  You know the one, with the words on the bottom.

Brooks Launch 

You knew this one would be on the list.  It was introduced back in 2009, and since then has been the best shoe on the wall.  Feed us enough espresso and we might even tell you that this is the shoe of the decade—both of them.  They aren’t minimalist, except that the midsole has been stripped of anything unnecessary, so don’t go calling us a minimalist store.    At the moment, you won’t find anything smoother on the wall or on the road.  When it was announced that the Launch was to be discontinued, well, I don’t want to call it chaos, but shit was ****ed up.  Women in the streets rending their Lululemon.  I know!  Seriously!  Mass jaywalking.  There were no breakfast tacos to be found—anywhere.  Pemberton Heights, 12th and Chicon, same difference.  Texas became the first state to make veganism the official religion.  Like I just said, shit was ****ed up!    The design of the Launch reminds us of days before people missed workouts because their Garmin wasn’t charged; before people took gels on a 5 mile run; before people gave a shit about over-pronation.  At the same time, the Launch are what most minimalist… err biomechanically appropriate… shoes should be, albeit maybe with a higher offset.  But you know what we’re talking about.  They’re foam, with complete ground contact.  Brooks, the number one brand at running specialty now, are dropping the Launch from their lineup, because Brooks believe that you can’t make a good running shoe without actually ****ing it up first, er, I mean adding a bunch of technology to it.  I love this shoe and I don’t even wear it.  We were so upset by the news that we built a makeshift grave site to mock Brooks.  Then, several months later, Luke’s did the same thing, completely trumping us in creativity and absurd displays of sadness.

ASICS Tarther

The Tarther, like the Launch, are no mas.  ASICS, in their infinite wisdom, and by wisdom I mean obtuseness, pulled the plug on the Tarther after one year because, well, we don’t know why.  You can still get them in Europe, so um, yeah.  But we’re gonna assume and speculate all over the place.  They didn’t sell well enough to get traction or there wasn’t enough “science” behind them, and by “science” I mean features that are easily marketable.  I’m going to go out there and say that the simplicity of this beautiful shoe is such that they went over the head of the American market, or of ASICS marketing team, whichever.  If something is that basic, it can’t be any good, no?  Like Brooks, ASICS didn’t want to put marketing dollars into a shoe that doesn’t have any marketability, other than being a superior shoe.  The Tarther were marathon racers here in the US, which means that we love it, sometimes publically and mostly inappropriately.  Did you ever notice that the Tarther and the original Adios were almost identical?  It’s true.  Both designed in the Japanese market, marathon racers, similar responsiveness, ride, fit.  Yep.  It’s no wonder our pants feel funny when we wear these shoes.  I could continue ragging ASICS for yanking that shit, but instead I’ll just say, thank you for the opportunity to have run in the Tarther.

Newton

Wait, wait wait!  Hear me out!  I know, I know, I know.  WTFF?  Yeah, it took us three years to bring Newton in, and believe me, it coulda been longer.  When Newton first came to us red flags went up right away, and maybe it had something to do with the whole triathlete, you know, thing.  I don’t know.  Or the lugs thing.  But when we sat down with Newton to talk about it, they were the only group who would or could actually talk about running as the context for the shoe, rather than the other way around.  Most reps you talk to about shoes can’t tell you anything other than what they memorized from their sales meetings and the answers we get don’t get much deeper than the ol’, “Well, it’s one louder, isn’t it?”  Yeah, the shoes are pricey; yeah they take some time to get familiar with; yeah the lugs are a little, I don’t know, weird.  But the more I think about it, the more I like that they are focusing on the forefoot for their technology, rather than the rearfoot.  We’re always down for the road less traveled, new design paradigms1, thinking outside the bush.  Did they get it right?  Dunno yet.  They fit like a sock/glove/second skin and once you get used to the feel of the lugs underfoot and recognize that, hmmm, they feel more like a really firm forefoot than the gooey marshmallows we’re used to, it’s a quite nice feel.  The other thing we like about Newton is that they are honest about what is marketing and what isn’t.  And in the running shoe biz, when you call someone out on that, they just get all defensive on you and say something like “We’re all an experiment of one,” or something equally as obtuse and dismissive.  Newton make a line of shoes from racer to lightweight to less lightweight to clunky, but the only models you need to know are the Distance (because we’re assholes) and the Gravity, which is the Distance with some rubber on the heel.  Subtle Chuck, who was the most vocal dissenter when a show of hands was requested about bringing in the Newtons, is now the most hyper proponent of the brand.  And that’s saying a lot because Subtle C still thinks that all music everywhere stopped after Terrapin Station.

Our Honorable Mention Awards 

Shoe most likely to be seen in a parking lot or on Arthur Lydiard’s feet, if he were alive and endorsed it, neither of which is true:  INOV-8 f-lite 195

Once upon a time, oh, about 2005 I think, INOV-8 came across the pond from the UK of England and was known only for making low-profile trail shoes.  These days, INOV-8 are known for, probably, Crossfit.  If you’re not familiar with Crossfit, it is a relatively new exercise program thing whereby you eat live animals regularly and throw giant truck tires and jump over your own barf because you just did, like, 9000 prisoner squats, and the catch is you have to do it in a parking lot on a busy street so everyone driving by can see you.  If you don’t do it in the parking lot, it’s called heavy construction work or sometimes farming.  Anyway, INOV-8 are the shoe of choice for the Crossfitters, because they believe in functional, fundamental strength work—I like ‘em already!—and shoes that are more minimaler than your traditional running shoe allow for a greater, more natural range of movement, which everyone except podiatrists believe is a good thing.  But they’re running shoes to me, except for the ones now labeled Crossfit or whatever, and they are what I think Lydiard would like, except he’d want them in beige or maybe black because of the whole New Zealand thing.   Just about the simplest uppers on the wall, they fit like, you know; and nothing but EVA underfoot with some rubber for gription making them light, protective and flexible.  They come in three or four offsets, so you can fit the whole family.  We think INOV-8 are getting a little cocky, because the most recent catalog we were given has way too many models for a company so small and so young.  But they make cool looking, great fitting, smooth as silk road and trails shoes and thus far, the 195 is the best of all that.  3mm offset (not that it matters), super simple upper, foam, rubber.   Cheerio.

Best Bloop for the Buck:  Nike Pegasus 29

Oh, man.  If ever a model had some history in the running market, this is it.  Through so many different incarnations (remember the polyurethane?), the Peg have always filled a spot in the, let’s call it “lower end” of the neutral/cushion category.  And by lower end I mean that it never had all the bling and superfluous crap that so many shoes have these days.  It usually stood about $15-$20 lower on the scale than other models, yet in our opinion was probably better than the luxury end stuff.  The 29th incarnation is one of the best, though we still think it is going the opposite direction it needs to travel.  The fit is as good as it gets:  The knit upper is so light and unobtrusive that it almost feels as if it is on the wrong midsole/outsole combination; the upper feels like what I want racing flats to feel like.  But then we get to the midsole/outsole.  It kinda makes my heart hurt, if you want to know the truth.  When I take these Pegs for a spin, I want so badly to love them and for them to love me back.  It’s like the ultimate dysfunctional relationship, isn’t it?  If you look up the word “bloop” in the Oxford English Dictionary, there is a picture of the Peg 29.  M’er F’er bloop.  There is almost no ground feel whatsoever.  But, hey, not that there’s anything wrong with that, right?  I mean, like, no ground feel.  You’re a couple inches off the ground when you put these bad girls on.  Platforms.  New York Dolls and shit.  But it does retain some nice rear-fore transition because of the complete ground contact.  One guy sent me an email or Facebook message or something espousing his profound love for this shoe—his favorite shoe everrrrrrrr—and I didn’t argue with him.  He likes it.  He’s also super efficient and fast and couldn’t tip the scales on a can of Pringles.  But that is less important than almost anything perhaps.  Dude just likes his Pegs.  For the type of shoe it is, the Peg is maybe the best.

They Should Rename This Shoe the Phoenix:  Saucony Ride

This shoe used to be, and please excuse in advance the vulgarities that follow, a ****ing piece of ****.  Really, it was bad.  No, I mean, you wouldn’t get projectile compound fractures or anything, but it was pretty archaic in just about all ways.  It was, let’s face it, ugly.  And it was heavy.  And it was inflexible.  And the fit was, depending on the model, alternately poor and bad.  So when Saucony decided to get with the times and lower the heel/toe offset from 12mm to 8mm, well, it didn’t solve any of the problems in, like, Darfur or someplace, but it was a positive move.  But this new Ride is light, fits well in that old Saucony way, and is much, much smoother than the old, tired, worn out version.  Ok, ok, there’s still the issue with that midfoot truss, which is not only entirely unnecessary, but unsightly and probably unethical. Nevertheless, we’re awarding the Ride with this, um, award because it’s done a complete 360.  Wait.  180.  270?  Dang. Translation: we like it.

Ghost Killa:  Also the… Saucony Ride

Ok, so here’s what happened.  There used to be this shoe that Brooks made called the Burn.  Shoe was bad ass.  The first version was pretty good, you know, not bad.  But the second version rocked your face off.  Shit was awesome!  I had a couple pair of them back in the day, or 2006 or whatever, and ran many a fine mile (or kilometer, for you Canadiites) up and down the ditches of the Albuquerque Valley.  Man!  Loved that shoe!  And then it went away—pulled from the lineup—probably  because it had everything that is a good running shoe needs, and nothing a good marketing person wants.  So, sort of tacitly, we were told that the Ghost was the replacement for the Burn.  Yeah, um, no.  Not really.  That first version was as close as it got, but that was still more of a sortakindanotreally lightweight trainer.  It was a little bit lower profile that what you see now, and firmer, and if memory serves and it rarely does, it felt faster.   And then the Launch came in and pushed the Ghost into the gordosphere.  Which, for Brooks, is alright because it is the best selling shoe they have that isn’t an Adrenaline.   Indeed, it is everyperson’s shoe.  Not really remarkable except that you put it on and immediately want to sit down with your non-fat soy latte (huh?) with your flat front khakis while you pretend to read Dwell in your neighborhood Starbucks.  Sold the M’er F’er outta those things.  We did.

And so when Saucony bringed out the new Ride, we deemed it the Ghost Killa.  Everything (almost everything, anyway) that we wanted to change about the Ghost, Saucony beat us to it.  Pretty quickly the Ride began to eat up the Ghost numbers here at the Rogue.  In our own Pepsi Challenge of Shoes, the Ghost on one foot, the Ride on the other, and without any prompting other than cash incentives, the Ride won out.  I know, right?  Not that we have anything against the Ghost, except that it appears to be heading in the exact opposite direction we want shoes to go.  And the Ride happens to be heading in the Rogue Approved direction.

Shoe most likely to be worn to get sex from someone who didn’t care that you leave your shoes on during sex: adidas gazelle

This is a shoe that you could take to Vegas, wear to the club on Friday night, rock the bottle service, get into all kinds of Hangover-like shenanigans…  And then, when you wake up on a mattress on the roof, you might be otherwise naked, but you’d have the nicest, smoothest, nirvana of a recovery jog around the roof perimeter until someone comes and gets you down. So, get’em now since, you know, we’re the only store in the country that has them until January. And, you’ve got lots of partying to do before then.

Best upper on a shoe that is already dead: Mizuno Wave Precision

We write this entry with just a bit of sadness.  Not a sadness that would be outwardly visible to others, I don’t know maybe the kind of sadness you have when your favorite drawers—the ones you’ve had since undergrad—blow a hole and you have to hide them from the person you share a bed with because you know they’ll throw that shit out.  The thing about the Precision is that they have almost always been a good shoe, but this latest incarnation became a really good shoe; they were what they’ve wanted since it was introduced.  They look great, have almost nothing that you don’t need, and the fit is the shit.  The fit is as clean as a Waffle House bathroom and the familiar Mizuno feel is still there.  You like this shoe?  Yeah?  So sorry.  Gone.  Gone.  All gone.  Don’t panic yet… we’ll have them through next July, but next year the Precision will be a part of history, replaced by the awkwardly named Wave Sayonara.  Knowing all this, the Sayonara should be a bitchin shoe, but there will be many of you who will find need to buy, like, nine pair of Precision because they are the best shoe everrrrrrrrr.

Best Trail Shoe Period:  New Balance MT110

Yeah, you care about this one.  Because you run on trails all the time, eating your hummus wraps that Jurek told you about and using your wool socks to wipe your ass.  You know how to filter the water of Barton Creek so that you don’t get Ebola or whatever.  And when you get back in your Outback L.L. Bean Edition to drive the two miles back from the trail head, you recover with grass fed salmon jerky and a chia recovery drink from the Ho Foo.  I don’t know what all that means, but I do now that this shoe will rock your face off and leave you thinking someone fed you bath salts.  I don’t know what that means either.  The 110 is pretty much the archetype of the modern trail shoe:  Low profile, protective, flexible, laser proof, speaks four languages fluently, uses the degree it took from undergrad, is kind to animals and has the Dalai Lama on speed dial.  The Cascadia might be the best selling trail shoe, but the people who buy that one are also the ones who keep their ski lift tags on their winter jacket so you know where they went skiing (A Basin).

Best Shoe That’s Aaaalllmost there…

When I first put the ASICS Gel Lyte on, the first thing that popped into my head was, “GD!  I’m gonna like this shoe!”  You need to read that as if it sounds like disappointment, rather than as an exultation.  Like, Awwww, maaaan….That kind of thing.  Like a kid would sound, a little whiney, when you reneg on the bribe to take them to Amy’s for a scoop if they mow the park.  ASICS has for the last decade or so been the shoe that most of the running population wore.  They are known for shoes like the Kayano, the Nimbus and the 2000 series, which is interesting because at least two of those we don’t really think of as running shoes, per se, but more like fashion shoes for people who want you to think they run.  Today, for example when I was at the Ho Foo down there on the corner, while standing in line to pay for my Fuji, fresh young coconut, avocado and organic macadamia butter Ezekiel wrap, I counted no less than nine or eleven Kayanos on the feet of rather lean Lululemon pant wearing females.  None of these Kayanos had any sort of dust or other contaminant on them.  They are sort of the Lunarglide for the Real Housewives of Travis County or whatever.

But the Lyte was, at first, brilliant.  Firm, flexible, light, low.  Praise Allah!  But then I ran in them for a week or so, and realized that the upper is severely lacking.  It was on the narrow side.  And when I say narrow, I mean I feel like I’m a 19th century Asian woman.  On me anyways.  With my narrow feet.  I know of several people who think the fit is awesome.  Perfetto, the French say.  But I take the insoles out of all my shoes, so the fit is actually ok.

This shoe had the potential to be a sort of saving grace for the whole Tarther, you know, thing.  Though nowhere near as impressive as the Tarther, the Lyte was something kinda like when your server totally  ****s up your order, but then gives you, like, a free flan after and you go, yeah, ok, that’s cool.

The good news—or the weird news, depending on how you’re gonna look at it—is that the Lyte is being replaced.  By the…wait for it…Lyte Part Deux.  It’s still pretty low, pretty light, but now the upper is going to fit much cleaner, many more people, and not make you feel like you’re being punished.  On the other coin, the midsole outsole now will have multiple densities, which doesn’t mean much if you’re not into, you know, performance.  The gooder news is that the price goes down $10.  Which tells you that ASICS is telling you which shoe to buy.  Hm.  Kinda like them dropping the Hyperspeed, at $80, and replacing it with the Noosafast, which is a Hyperspeed with kangaroos or some shit painted on them, at $100.  The 2d pair of laces are the extra $20, apparently.

And so, ladies and gentlemen, in conclusion, if you’re worried that you might be in the wrong running shoes, maybe you should go to the zen center, do some yoga or yardwork or some shit, and quit worrying so much.  It’s running, man, it ain’t Gaza.  JFR.  Also, the Big John cookies at Ho Foo are awesome.

1I just wanted you all to recognize that I used the word paradigm here.   Thanks.

Check it:  For those of you who fancy yourself a dedicated runner, a dedicated marathoner, who wants to find out what you’re made of, John coaches Team Rogue on T, Th mornings at 5:30.

Offwhat?

by John Schrup

For those of you who consider such things, may we present to you an incomplete list of some of the footwear available on the Rogue Wall and their offsets.  The offset, or differential, or drop, or ramp or whateverthe**** you want to call it, is the difference in millimeters between the height of the foam under the heel and under the forefoot.  Each company measures a bit differently, and offset is not to be confused with stack height, which is the total height of all the stuff under your foot—outsole, midsole, insert.  So stack height can be upwards of 10mm higher, if you’re looking at a really high end luxury shoe.

Just because a shoe has a lower offset doesn’t mean the shoe is going to be smoother, though that help a bit.  We have several models in our quiver with higher offsets, and they are as smooth or smoother than shoes with lower offsets.  For example, the Adios is 9mm, and it is way smoother that the Pure Flow, which is a full 5mm lower.  Similarly, not all shoes with the same offset are going to feel the same.  The Launch, the men’s Nimbus and the Dyad all come in at 10mm, yet feel way, way different.  There are so many other variables to consider—weight, durometer (the firmness of the shoe), whether there is any proprietary drop in (superfluous) cushioning or midfoot truss, the fit of the shoe—that it won’t do you any good to buy a shoe just because it has a lower or higher offset.  In the same way that we once chose shoes based on arch height and stuff like that.

Generally, we prefer lighter and lower.  But you might not.  You could be running in an Ariel with a rigid plastic orthotic and that might be the least amount of shoe you are comfortable with.  So go with that.  As a rule:  If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

All of this—these numbers that really don’t mean much in the end—is considerably less important if your body is strong and resilient.  If you aren’t, ain’t no shoe in the world gonna do you a lick of good.  Note, too, that these numbers are as determined not by the maker of the shoe, but by independent testing, so the numbers might vary from what you’ve seen.

0mm
NB Trail00
NB Road00
K-Swiss Blade Foot
Mizuno EVO Cursoris (2013)
Brooks Pure Drift (2013)

3mm
INOV-8  195
Newton Distance

4mm
NB Trail110
Saucony Kinvara
Saucony Kinvara TR
Brooks Pure Flow
adidas adipure Adapt

5mm
adidas Hagio
NB Road10
Brooks Pure Connect
Brooks Pure Cadence
Saucony Mirage
Newton Gravity

6mm
INOV-8 230
ASICS Gel Lyte33
adidas adipure Gazelle
NB1600

8mm
Saucony Ride
Saucony Triumph
adidas adipure Motion
NB 890
NB 870

9mm
adidas Adios
Mizuno Wave Musha
Brooks Ravenna

10mm
adidas Feather
ASICS Tarther
ASICS DS Trainer
ASICS M Nimbus
ASICS GT2000
ASICS Excel33
Brooks Dyad
Brooks Launch
Brooks Cascadia

11mm
Brooks Ghost
NB 1400

12mm
Mizuno Wave Rider
Mizuno Wave Elixir
Brooks Racer ST
Brooks Adrenaline
Nike Pegasus

13mm
Mizuno Wave Precision

Check it:  For those of you who fancy yourself a dedicated runner, a dedicated marathoner, who wants to find out what you’re made of, John coaches Team Rogue on T, Th mornings at 5:30.

My List

by John Schrup

Pretty soon in this space you’ll see a list of the Best Rogue Shoes of 2012.  We probably should have named it something with a better hook, but we’re doing our lunge matrix right now, so time is limited.  It seems to me that every year about this time, shortly after the high temperatures drop to double digits and the Starbucks puts up its Christmas tree, we get lists of all the things that the past year has broughten us.  I blame David Letterman.

So my list isn’t really a list, rather just a space to tell you what shoes I wear regularly in my rotation.  I have, I don’t know, maybe a dozen or so pair that I wear.  Some more than others.  Some rarely, kinda like when you’re going through your high school yearbook and you go, Hm, wonder what she’s been doing.  But there are, like, five pair that I rotate pretty regularly.  I’m going to give them to you here and now because, you know, I’ve had coffee.   A quick glance in the back seat of the Yaris gives us this:

 Saucony A5:  Technically, Saucony’s race flat.  They should call it the Kinvara Racer because it would make more sense in terms of branding and, you know, sounding better.  These bad girls are tight!  Not fit wise, but you know what I’m talking about.  If I were talking about tight fit, I’d talk about the Gloria Vanderbilt jeans Jill Strelsky wore when we went to see The Devil and Max Devlin back in the day.  I’m not going to tell you how old I was when that happened, but I will tell you I remember being pretty excited because that year in school we got to use the lined paper that didn’t have the little training wheel dashes between the big lines.  So, um, yeah.   Not only was she hot, but girl was ****ing awesome in the four square tournaments at lunch.  Anyway, Sauncony A5 because it is light, low and feels like Jill’s jeans look.

adidas Adios 2:  Even though it would appear that the A2 goes against     everything I look for in a shoe–it ain’t particularly low, nor flexible, it’s got all kinds of shit in the midsole–when I put these things on to run I can vote retroactively and the TSA people get in line to frisk me.  They are the most beautifully firm shoe I’ve ever worn.  I’ve got two or three other pair with similar offsets, but none feel as fast as these do.  If you were to chart the awesomeness of these shoes, I’d let you, and then I’d do venn diagram of it.   I’ve got my fingers crossed that the bottle lands on the original Adios, since they’re way sexier, but these are worthy of a shared visit to the closet, totally.  I bet though that when the Takumi Sen comes out, my A2′s become that kid at the party who fiddles around with all the stereo equipment because no one picks them to make out.

 

Ok, so it appears that I’m stuck somewhere back in the early 80′s, if we go by the content of the first two on the list.  Let’s fast forward to the mid-to late-80′s, if your brain cells go there.

Saucony Kinvara 3:  This shoe, at one point, was like that older girl you met in summer school who was really cool because she listened to PE when you were still singing “Abracadabra.”  She was ahead of her time, super sexy and you had to keep your shirt untucked when you ran/saw her in the hall.  Yeah, I’d make it a little firmer, but this shoe disappears on your foot, and that’s pretty much what a shoe is supposed to do, so I’m not complaining.  If the K3 had the firmness of the A2, holy crap, I’d totally get arrested for the things I’m thinking right now.  Or maybe applauded, I don’t know your background.

New Balance 1600:  Not too long ago, this would have been the 1400.  But then the 1600 came out, and so you drop the first one for the roommate, and the first one starts driving by your place when the roommate is there, even though you live like nine miles from campus and then the first one comes up to you in front of the administration building when you’re on your way to the sorority thing in the Pub and she gets all in your face and you can tell she’s had a drink or two and then she grabs your tie and tries to throw you to the ground but you do one of those Matrix moves and get out of it and then have to file a police report and then you stick with the 1600, because it is sexier, anyway.

Wow.  I’m reliving the glory days, it would seem.  Since there are only four pair of shoes in the Yaris right now, the fifth one would have to be:

adidas Rocket:  You thought I was going to say the Hagio, dintcha?  Nope.   I’ve got a stash of the Rocket in the living room closet.  It is pretty old school, especially when compared to the Hagio, which is all dépêche mode and shit, but it is smoother, doesn’t make that slappy sound when you’re breaking it in, and the upper is way more better.  The Rocket is like that guy you knew who was pretty much everything you ever wanted in a boyfriend, but just couldn’t pull the trigger because he looked like an Alfred E. Newman/arachnid hybrid.  Performs at the highest level, is everything you want, super awesome on all fronts, except that you just don’t completely dig it on a count of the whole, you know, ugly thing.  I’m going to say it again:  When the Takumi Sen arrives, even the Rocket is gonna be all, Why don’t you return my messages anymore?

Check it:  For those of you who fancy yourself a dedicated runner, a dedicated marathoner, who wants to find out what you’re made of, John coaches Team Rogue on T, Th mornings at 5:30.

Review: Asics GT 2000

by John Schrup

I know.  I had to.

The GT series has been one of the most popular running shoes across the globe for more than a decade.  It’s like a Toyota Camry, except shoes.  Never flashy or remarkable other than the consistency, with a minor tweak here or there.  ASICS are finally forced to change what once was the archetypal stability running shoe due to market pressures to go lighter, leaner, blingier.  Okay, let’s not use the word change, because that’s for politicians; instead let’s use the word “repackage.”

Back in the day, or 1996, one of my all-time favorite shoes, the ASICS GT 2020 was the shit.  Ugly as all get out, at least by today’s standards—it was all white with just enough of the black accenting so that it didn’t look like the shoes you wear when you go get your Luann at the Luby’s over there.  I can’t really remember what I liked about them, because those were the “Are you gonna finish that drink?” years.  I remember feeling very fast in them, that they fit right on the money and it was the first pair of stability shoes I ever had, because some dude in the running shop back home looked at my flat ass feet and told me I needed them.  So, yeah.  Pretty sure it was mostly the fit that I liked, which ASICS promptly screwed up with the 2030 when they narrowed the toe box.  Remember those?  With the blue and yellow.

Anyway, I forgot about the 2020’s for years, ‘til round about ’01-’02 or thereabouts when I got a pair of the Puma that were bad to the ass.  The Complete Pryde II or something like that.  It was basically the 2020, with the Puma logo and it was navy.  I loved the shit out of that shoe.  I don’t know why you needed to know that, but there you go.

Over the years, BA (Before Adrenaline) the GT series became the number one shoe on the planet.  All those years we believed that we needed stability shoes because we were told by people who were thought to know stuff.  As a general rule.  Like, more than 75% of the population wore stability shoes.  But because ASICS tends to respond to the market on the, you know, slow side, and people started asking for and buying into the new generation of running shoes, the GT lost some street cred.

Which brings us to now:  The GT 2000.  The lighter, more colorful 20whateverweareatnow.   ASICS removed some weight—good, good—and made some midsole/outsole changes that make them feel a bit smoother, but it is really more of a repackaging than a change.  It’s kinda like the forty-something regular to average guy who gets divorced and then the next time you see him he’s wearing skinny jeans and a Count Chocula tshirt or some shit.  The pair I’ve been wearing—no, the shoes, not the jeans—is lime green with some red, is pretty unASICS-like, so that’s good.  The fit is the best part of these bad mamajamas.  Glove-a-licious.  New welded overlays make for a light, snug fit.  They’ve retained some of the responsiveness that made them favorites among the faster crowd—at least, at one time—except now you can really feel the pillowtop they’ve added to the midsole.  So it’s got nice step in feel, but once you get running, they’re decently responsive.  Still feels like I’m wearing KISS boots though.  (Maybe that’s a better analogy:  Once top of the charts rockers get rebranded for their reunion tour!)

Anyway, if you’ve been a fan of the GTs, you’ll be an even bigger fan of these.  ASICS knows better than to mess with something that’s worked well for so long, but recognizes that everything changes and the time for a change is now, and by now I mean like 5 years ago.  I know tons of people who swear by the GTs and they’re going to see this model as the best of the bunch.

Review: Kinvara Trail

 

 

 

 

by John Schrup

I don’t always run in trail shoes.  But when I do, I run in the Kinvara TR.

No.  No I don’t.  Well, sort of.  I mean, the only time I wear trail shoes any more is when I’m back in NM and it’s mud season.  I left some original INOV-8′s at my father’s house, back in the day.  Oh man, I miss those shoes.

You all know I’m a big fan of the Kinvara 3.  And you all know that if it were a wee bit firmer, it would be the greatest shoe in the history of mankind, except for this pair of high top Chuck Taylors I had back in freshman year of high school that I wore to Black Flag at Circle A Ranch.  I spilled some Bartles & Jaymes or something on ‘em, which shouldn’t surprise anyone.  When I was a freshman in high school, I looked like a tall fetus.  I was a late bloomer.

Anyway, the Kinvara is a good shoe for a broad spectrum of people, much like the Launch, much like the Adios.  Each of these shoes could be improved, but don’t really need to be.  They are about as good as they get.  Different shoes, to be sure, but all legit.  I wish more companies would make shoes like these–good shoes for everyone; not so niche–and then build their running lines around them.  As it is, there are all these different shoes for this foot or that foot or whatever and the reality is that if they only made the, like, three or four shoes that were necessary, they wouldn’t make any money.

Saucony recognized a good thing and made the Kinvara TR.  The Kinvara is such a popular shoe that it was pretty much a sure thing that the TR was coming.

Word of warning:  You’ll want to wear it on the roads, but you probably shouldn’t.  Remember what I said about the K3 and firmness?  Yes’m.  Here ’tis.  The reason that it really won’t transfer well to roads is that you’ve got this tacky, lugged outsole that will just shear off when you put it to the asphalt.  The firmness is brought to you by a rockguard, which also reduces the flexibility of the forefoot a bit, though you won’t care because the weight and fit of the thing are so good that you’d forgive almost anything.  These bad girls are attached!  Ok, the forefoot could be a bit leesssssss snug, but they can fix that next go ’round.  Just like big sis/bro/whatever, the KTR has a low offset and fast feel.  If you are still of the mindset that a trail shoe should be a light hiker with some color to it, this shoe could be the mind changer.  The 3 was, for many, the introduction to “minimalism” whatever that means, and the TR could be the same deal here.  Saucony is firing on all cylinders.  They should change the name of the A5 to the Kinvara Racer, shouldn’t they?

So if you’ve not yet bought a pair of trail shoes because you haven’t yet run Pikes Peak, this is as good an introduction as any.  And some of the colors are cool too, so they got that going for them.  Which is nice.

Oh, please oh please, Saucony, combine the firmness of the TR with the rest of the 3.  Pretty please.  I’ll be your best friend.  I’ll give you…favors.  Please.  But that probably won’t happen because it would add weight to the shoe and from what the fine folks over there at the Saucony tell me, they don’t want to mess with that.  FTS!  Mess with it.  Add a half oz.  Please!!!

The List

by John Schrup

My eldest son, Isaac (three and a half/almost four/46 months/1395 days, give or take a few) has a solid understanding of gift giving.  As long as he’s the one on the receiving end, anyway.  Giving?  Not so much.  “You could get it for me for my birthday,” is a relatively common suggestion.  One day we practiced unwrapping presents, much, I suppose, in the same way we would practice running in progression or some shit.  We spent about an hour, me giving him things that he already owned—light sabers, plastic food, puzzle pieces—and he unwrapping the newspaper over and over and over, always with a well played display of surprise.  “Thanks, Papa!  Just what I’ve always wanted!”

At some point in these one-act plays, he’ll ask when, exactly, is his birthday again?  Can it be tomorrow?  He loves his presents, that kid.  There is an imaginary list that is updated regularly which contains all the things that he’s ever asked for.  “Just put it on the list.”  The other boy, Sam, has not a concept for gifts whatsoever, other than that things go in his mouth.

I tell you all this not to impress upon you in any way that my children are any different from any other children you have or know, because they are not.  It is not important that Isaac was, actually, the first child ever in the history of the planet to say, “Papa, look at me!” and then to fall down dramatically in a heap.

I tell you all this because I am making my very own list of things I want, and I need to share it with you.  What can I say?  I’m a giver.

My list is shoes.  Go figure.  There are several that I’m salivating over, and they aren’t even on the wall yet.   In January, some new models are due to arrive, and I’m pretty much so excited I’m in danger of wetting myself.  In public.  So don’t ask me about the new shoes if you see me in the Central Market.   This list I’m creating could end up being pretty extensive, but I’m only gonna give you a handful of them.  I’m doing this for your benefit, you know.  I’ve had a quad Americano and I’m afraid it’s gonna get wordy up in here.

Zero drop hits the masses.  When this whole “minimalist” thing began, Vibram was pretty much it as far as zero drop.  Now we’ve got almost everyone in the game and the result is some really nice stuff for you to run in.  These are really cushioned shoes with a zero offset, which means that the foot is essentially parallel to the ground.  Until now, most zero drop shoes were pretty thin and while they offered some really nice road feel, after several miles…ow ow ow!

 

Brooks Puredrift 

I know, right?  Brooks, best known for the Beast and the Adrenaline, gets real and introduces the fourth model in the Pure lineup.  The Drift fits snug through the midfoot and has a fairly roomy toe box so your tootsies can splay.  It will be superduper soft—in that ol’ familiar Brooks way—and will have the flexibility of a gymnast.  It will be kinda barefootish, but the softeness and the upwards curve of the forefoot (how the shoe is sprung) is a nod toward the mass market.  It’ll be like a house slipper made of cotton candy.

 

Saucony Virrata

You knew this bad girl was coming.  G’on, you knew.  Saucony has done wonderfully well with the Kinvara, creating one of the very best shoes on the wall.  Light, flexible, good fit.  Pretty much all you need in a shoe.  Our friends at Saucony already had a zero drop shoe, the Hattori, but the first version was a slip on, which is generally avoided by the masses, and it is pretty thin overall, so it bottoms out after about 50 miles.  The second incarnation has laces, but still it is going to work only as a supplementary option due to the lack of material underfoot.  Never fear, Virrata is here!  The Virrata is, in essence, a zero drop Kinvara.  It even looks like the K3.  It runs a bit softer, but with more than ample cushioning underfoot, so the zero drop will be more palatable for those of you willing to try.  If you are a FOK, you could be a FOV.

 

Mizuno Evo Levitas/Cursoris

Mizuno is, like ASICS, based in Japan, which means that adapting to market change takes a little longer.  You’ve got to go across the oceans to get an ok on something, after all.  And so Mizuno, like ASICS, has been a little late in keeping up with the trend toward lighter and lower.  Not that Mizuno hasn’t had those options—the Universe is a favorite in the Pose crowd—they just haven’t marketed them as such.  Do you find it a little strange, then, that Mizuno introduces two zero drop shoes concurrently before introducing anything else less polarizing?  A 4mm maybe?  I have to give them credit though, they’re also bringing over from Japan the Ekiden, a very popular racer that can be seen as a beefier Universe.   I might be more excited about that one!  And, forgive me for being a little picky, but the name Cursoris makes me feel a little nervous, a little dirty.  I don’t know why.   The Levitas is the more “minimal” of the two, which leads me to believe that the Cursoris will have a broader reach in the market.  Though at $120, compared to $110 for the Levitas, maybe not.

 

adidas Takumi Sen 

The Takumi Sen is not a zero drop shoe, but it doesn’t matter:  This shoe will make you change your political views.  Think of it as a finely constructed, lighter, lower, faster Adios.   With a 6mm offset, you’ll feel the ground but it won’t matter because you’ll be flying over it.  Designed by the godfather of Japanese shoe design, Mimura, who has designed shoes for just about everyone, including Olympic Gold Medalist Mizuki Noguchi, the Takumi Sen is the real deal all around racing flat—fast, light (4.6 oz. men’s 9) fast!  This shoe will make you faster.  It will clear up your skin.  You will have command over your native language.  It will give you confidence in front of a crowd. This shoe will melt your face off.

Put these on the list.

Check it:  For those of you who fancy yourself a dedicated runner, a dedicated marathoner, who wants to find out what you’re made of, John coaches Team Rogue on T, Th mornings at 5:30.

Shoe Boner Awards: The Trailer

by John Schrup

In a month or so, and by month we mean in the future, but before the end of the year, we’re going to release the Rogue Shoes of 2012:  The Shoe Boner Awards This list will include the very best shoes available by Rogue standards and presented to you in a way that only we can do it.  Which is to say that if you are running in a model that is not found on the list then, well, two words:  Dance off.

We must apologize in advance, because you will be offended, perhaps disgusted and because we can’t give you a more specific ETA on the SBA.   I’m behind schedule on several things, including laundry, due to the unfortunate encounter with the clam paneer at the Taco Delhi.  So you’ll see it when you see it.  I hope.  I’m still sweating.

What makes a shoe Rogue?  What makes a shoe worthy of The Wall at Rogue?  You mean, besides when you put them on and all of a sudden old ladies in track suits are frisking you in the HEB?  We like shoes that are simple designs, functional shoes.  That’s pretty much it.  We don’t go in for the bling, the “technologies” that are less technology and more, you know, stupid.  We tend to prefer shoes that might seem a little basic, a little old school.  We like shoes that allow you to do what you’re designed to do.   And we recognize that a shoe is only a small piece of the puzzle.  First you’ve gotta get fit, and we’re not talking V02 Max fit.  Structurally sound fit.  If you’re looking for the magic bullet, stop!  There ain’t one, except the one you see when you look in your mirror each morning for your daily affirmations.  Your running shoes are your most personalized tools.  If you’re thinking about them, noticing them when you’re running, then they aren’t doing you right.

You know the shoe is the right one for you when it is the one that disappears most on your foot.  It feels like an extension of your foot.  It feels most natural to you.  It is the one you notice least.  It is the one that you are intuitively drawn to.  It is easy to overthink the process because we have been taught that we need all kinds of stability or cushioning and all that shit.  No, no you don’t.  You know what you need, intuitively, you just have to learn how to recognize it.

So what are some things to look for in a shoe?  Well, several things. None of these are writ in stone, but they are great places to start.  We have noticed over the years, after fitting, like, bazillions of people and coaching almost that much, that the following design characteristics tend to work best for the widest variety of runners, , including you.  And if you think we are just going to list “minimalist” shoes, because we are a “minimalist” store, which I’ve heard several times in the last few weeks—in other cities, nonetheless—then you will get West Nile.  First, I don’t even know what that means, and B.) I’m pretty sure Donald Judd didn’t help with the build out of either store.  In your face!

Minimal overlays.  Most overlays are unnecessary.  They just are.  Most of them are there to make the shoe prettier, or more space shuttle-y, or something.  If a shoe is well designed and with good materials, there will be just enough up top to secure the shoe to the foot, and nothing more.

Lightweight.  With the resources, materials and talent that the shoe companies have these days, if your shoe is heavier than 10 oz. in men’s 9, or 8.5 oz. in women’s 7, they’re on the heavy side.  I know, right?

Flexible.  The shoe should be at least moderately flexible from heel to toe and from side to side.  Most feet are pretty flexible, and they are that way for a reason, for shock absorption, for propulsion.  If a shoe is too rigid or inflexible, it hinders the ability of the foot to do what it is supposed to do.  You’ll know if it isn’t flexible enough if you hear a slapping when your forefoot hits the ground or if your heel slips a bit at toe off.

Complete ground contact.  WTF is that?  Put your shoe, sole down, on the table or person in front of you.  From heel to toe you should see very little daylight along the point where the shoe meets the surface it is on.  You won’t find any midfoot trusses, just foam and rubber.  Complete ground contact makes the heel-toe transition much smoother, makes the shoe more inherently stable and, yep, lighter.  What does it look like?  Look at the Launch.  Classic example.  The 890/1400/1600?  Totally.  Pegasus?  Yes’m.

Lower offset.  Traditionally, the standard offset has been about 12mm.  That’s the difference in foam height between the heel and the ball of the foot.  There is endless argument about whether it makes a difference, or not.  Here’s how you know what works for you:  Try different heel heights.  Then you’ll know.  Almost invariably, people feel more comfortable in offsets that are lower than the traditional heights.  The shoes feel smoother, your gait feels smoother, your skin feels smoother.  I’m not going to go into the argument here, because I don’t have enough coffee for that, but I will say that our experiential information tells us that lower is better.  How low?  I don’t know, mofo.

Knowing all this, there will be someone who says, “Hey man. What’s up with the Adios 2?  That one’s got all the shit you don’t like on it.  WTF?”  Yes.  Yes it does.  And it is still bad ass.

Straight ballin’ EVA.  Proprietary cushioning technologies really don’t do much for you except give the shoe a certain feel, maybe add a hint of durability and that’s about it.  Straight EVA is so much smoother underfoot, you don’t even know!  It might seem a little far-fetched, but bounce with me here for a second:   I think if you have, like, three or four or five different densities, materials—whatever–under your foot, your nervous system is picking up on that, whether you notice it or not.  Now think about walking on a surface that is just one material—grass, concrete, dirt—and then compare that to walking on a surface that is a mix of a whole bunch of different things—twigs, rocks, grass, dirt.  Which one is smoother?  I know, right?  Ok, so that’s a terrible analogy.  I’m a terrible analogyist.

Hold your breath.  Shoe Boner Awards coming soon.